closed-loop-delivery — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited closed-loop-delivery (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Treat each task as incomplete until acceptance criteria are verified in evidence, not until code is merely changed.
Core rule: deliver against DoD (Definition of Done), not against code diff size.
Use this skill when:
Do not use this skill for:
Before execution, define these once:
dev by default)2)If acceptance criteria are missing, request them once. If user does not provide, propose a concrete default and proceed.
Before execution, prefer using create-issue-gate.
ready and execution gate is allowed, continue.draft, do not execute implementation/deploy/review loops.dev when runtime behavior matters.Avoid noisy short polling by default. Use batched windows:
3m, collect delta comments/reviews6m, collect delta again10m, collect all remaining visible comments/reviewsAt each round:
10m round, stop waiting and proceed with all comments visible at that pointIf CI is still running, align polling to check completion boundaries instead of fixed rapid polling.
Require explicit user confirmation for:
Stop and escalate with a concise blocker report when:
2 default)Escalation report must include:
When claiming completion, always include:
Do not claim success without evidence.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.