Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
pci-dss-mcp
Static analysis MCP server for Go payment service codebases. Every detected PCI DSS v4.0.1 violation in a Go payment service codebase is mapped to the specific requirement number before the code ships.
What it does
pci-dss-mcp is a stdio MCP server that runs 12 scanners, an orchestrator, and an AI triage engine over a Go payment service codebase. Each finding carries a requirement_id mapped to a specific PCI DSS v4.0.1 line item; see docs/requirement-mapping.md for the canonical rule-to-requirement table and testdata/vulnerable-payment-service/EXPECTED-FINDINGS.md for live golden output.
What pci-dss-mcp catches today
- HTTP framework input flow into log / error / panic sinks. Tier 1 frameworks (gin, chi, gorilla/mux, net/http (Go 1.22+), echo v4, fiber v2) and Tier 1 loggers (log/slog, logrus, zap, zerolog, logr, klog, hclog) ship in v0.7. Tier 2 (kratos, apex/log, charmbracelet/log) lands in v0.8. Tier 3 (fasthttp, beego, iris, httprouter, project-internal) is user-configurable via Phase 25 YAML once shipped. See docs/http_input_taint.md.
What pci-dss-mcp is NOT
- Not a replacement for broad SAST. Use Semgrep, CodeQL, or gosec for OWASP Top-10 and language-agnostic vulnerabilities.
- Not a replacement for LLM-based code review. pci-dss-mcp maps payment-specific issues to PCI DSS requirement IDs; LLM agents catch broad bugs via reasoning. The two layers compose.
- Not Go-agnostic. Go-specific AST patterns and taint flow tracing are what make the precision possible.
- Not a QSA replacement. Static analysis covers ~6% of PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirements. A Qualified Security Assessor must sign off on the rest.
Install
Go install (primary)
Requires Go 1.25+; use Go 1.26.9 or newer, because Go 1.25 is past end of life:
go install github.com/shyshlakov/pci-dss-mcp@latestThe binary lands at $(go env GOPATH)/bin/pci-dss-mcp. See docs/install-from-source.md for PATH resolution, the macOS codesign provenance fix, cosign verification, and the MCP client JSON config.
Docker (alternative)
docker pull ghcr.io/shyshlakov/pci-dss-mcp:v0.6.2Useful for CI pipelines, QSA auditors who do not develop Go locally, or any environment without a host Go toolchain.
MCP Registry
Listed as io.github.shyshlakov/pci-dss-mcp at registry.modelcontextprotocol.io. Auto-published on every tag.
Usage
Add to your MCP client config (Claude Desktop claude_desktop_config.json, Cursor .cursor/mcp.json, or claude mcp add for Claude Code):
{
"mcpServers": {
"pci-dss-mcp": {
"command": "docker",
"args": ["run", "-i", "--rm",
"--mount", "type=bind,src=/Users/you/go/src,dst=/Users/you/go/src,readonly",
"ghcr.io/shyshlakov/pci-dss-mcp:v0.6.2"]
}
}
}src= and dst= mirror the same absolute path so the container sees your code at the same path your host uses; prompts pass the normal host path with no translation. For the go install variant and per-client examples, see docs/usage.md.
Two prompts to paste into your MCP client:
Run pci-dss-mcp triage on /Users/you/payments-service. Use min_severity=MEDIUM and group findings by PCI DSS requirement.Generate a PCI DSS compliance report for /Users/you/payments-service in JSON format. Show requirement-level pass/fail status and severity counts.
Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Docs |
|---|---|---|
triage_findings | All scanners + AI classification + file:line context in one call | docs/triage_findings.md |
generate_compliance_report | Raw requirement pass/fail report (orchestrator over all scanners) | docs/generate_compliance_report.md |
scan_pan_data | PAN/SAD storage and logging (3.3.1, 3.4.1, 3.5.1) | docs/scan_pan_data.md |
check_encryption | Weak hashing, hardcoded keys, plain HTTP (4.2.1, 6.2.4) | docs/check_encryption.md |
check_tls_config | Insecure TLS configs (4.2.1) | docs/check_tls_config.md |
check_secrets_in_configs | Credentials in config files (8.6.2) | docs/check_secrets_in_configs.md |
check_error_handling | Error responses leaking sensitive context (6.2.4) | docs/check_error_handling.md |
check_auth_strength | Hardcoded passwords, weak policy, missing MFA, webhook signatures (8.3.1, 8.3.6, 8.4.2, 8.6.2) | docs/check_auth_strength.md |
audit_log_coverage | Missing audit logs on payment flows (10.2.1) | docs/audit_log_coverage.md |
check_data_retention | Missing TTL, sensitive storage, missing zeroing (3.2.1, 3.3.1) | docs/check_data_retention.md |
check_payment_page_scripts | Missing CSP/SRI/nonce on payment pages (6.4.3, 11.6.1) | docs/check_payment_page_scripts.md |
check_dependencies | Vulnerable Go dependencies via OSV (6.3.3); govulncheck-style privacy: no module names sent to OSV.dev. See docs/check_dependencies.md. Also covers update_vulnerability_db. | docs/check_dependencies.md |
generate_sbom | CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM from go.mod/go.sum (6.3.2) | docs/generate_sbom.md |
explain_requirement | Look up a PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirement by ID | docs/explain_requirement.md |
All tools declare typed OutputSchema. See docs/tools.md for the catalog index and migration history.
Documentation
- docs/usage.md, client setup, prompt templates, suppressing findings
- docs/severity.md, severity model and rule-to-severity mapping
- docs/taint.md, taint analysis defaults and toggles
- docs/scoping.md, package exclusion and CDE scope
- docs/comparison.md, pci-dss-mcp vs Semgrep / CodeQL / gosec / Snyk Code
- docs/ci-cd.md, GitHub Actions and GitLab CI integration
- docs/pci-coverage.md, PCI DSS v4.0.1 requirement coverage matrix
- docs/install-from-source.md, source build, cosign verification, reload
- docs/requirement-mapping.md, canonical rule_id to requirement_id table
- CONTRIBUTING.md, development setup, fuzz targets
- ROADMAP.md, planned features
- CHANGELOG.md, version history
Status
Active development, pre v1.0. See ROADMAP.md and CHANGELOG.md.
License
MIT, see LICENSE.
pci-dss-mcp is a static analysis tool. It cannot replace a Qualified Security Assessor. Use its output as input to your compliance process, not as the compliance itself.