metacognition — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited metacognition (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Self-assessment checkpoints.
BLOCKING METACOGNITION REQUIRED at:
ENFORCEMENT: Skipping metacognition = CRITICAL VIOLATION
| Task Type | Essential Rules | Optional Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | language/rules.md, ai-development-guide.md | architecture patterns |
| Bug Fix | ai-development-guide.md | debugging patterns |
| Design | documentation-criteria.md | architecture patterns |
| Testing | language/testing.md | coverage strategies |
| Refactoring | ai-development-guide.md | design patterns |
Immediate needs: Load only what's required now Progressive loading: Add rules as specific needs arise Cleanup: Unload rules after task completion
Note: Context management is user's responsibility. Ask for guidance if unsure.
☐ [MUST VERIFY] Task type and scale documented with evidence ☐ [MUST VERIFY] Required rules LOADED and file paths listed ☐ [MUST VERIFY] Success criteria MEASURABLE and specific ☐ [MUST VERIFY] Approach validated against existing patterns
GATE: CANNOT start coding if ANY unchecked
☐ [VERIFY] Following Work Plan from docs/plans/ ☐ [VERIFY] Making measurable progress (list completed items) ☐ [EVALUATE] Additional rules needed? (load IMMEDIATELY if yes) ☐ [EVALUATE] Blocked for >10 minutes? (MUST ask for help)
Dynamic Rule Loading Triggers:
ai-development-guide.md for debugging patternsENFORCEMENT: If progress stalled → MANDATORY metacognition
☐ [VERIFIED] ALL completion criteria met with evidence ☐ [VERIFIED] Code quality metrics passed (lint, test, build) ☐ [VERIFIED] Documentation updated (if applicable) ☐ [RECORDED] What worked/failed for next iteration
GATE: CANNOT mark complete without ALL verified
| Pattern | Signs | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| Over-engineering | Complex solution for simple problem | Simplify approach |
| Under-planning | Jumping into code too quickly | Step back, plan first |
| Tunnel vision | Ignoring alternatives | Consider other approaches |
| Quality debt | Skipping tests or docs | Complete properly |
| Context bloat | Loading unnecessary rules | Load only essentials |
When stuck:
ERROR HANDLING PROTOCOL:
When encountering an error or blocker:
If unable to resolve:
PRINCIPLE: Ask for help when genuinely stuck, not after arbitrary attempt count
Track:
Remember:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.