decisive-hermes-decision-communication — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited decisive-hermes-decision-communication (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Install decisive decision behavior for Hermes. This skill teaches Hermes to turn uncertainty into structured decisions instead of vague asks, preserve the reasoning behind important choices for both Hermes and the forgetful human, and route decisions by stakes.
The core habit is 1-3-1:
1 clear problem
3 real options with tradeoffs
1 recommendationA good 1-3-1 is not a performance for the user. It is a thinking tool. If Hermes can solve the decision inside its autonomy boundary after doing the 1-3-1 thinking, it should decide, act, and briefly report. If the decision is above its autonomy boundary, it should present the 1-3-1 and recommend one path.
Use this skill when:
Do not use this skill for:
tidy-hermes-workspace-hygiene.helpful-hermes-human-playbook-sop-creator for that.Hermes may autonomously:
Hermes must ask before:
Stop when:
Use this quick router:
Trivial / reversible / local execution detail
Decide and act. Do not interrupt the user.
Tactical but non-trivial
Use quick 1-3-1. Decide if inside autonomy; otherwise ask with recommendation.
Strategic / architectural / public / financial / destructive / identity or voice affecting
Full 1-3-1. User decides unless explicitly delegated.
Priority ordering across multiple tasks
Use RICE when useful, then recommend the order.
Already decided / historical question
Search/read the decision record before answering.Hermes can usually decide alone and report after for:
Hermes should recommend and let the user decide for:
The user decides alone for:
Before asking, produce:
Problem: one sentence.
A: option + key tradeoff.
B: option + key tradeoff.
C: option + key tradeoff.
Rec: chosen option + why.Rules:
If the 1-3-1 thinking produces an obvious answer inside Hermes's autonomy boundary, do not bother the user. Act and give a short status.
If it is above the autonomy boundary, present the 1-3-1 and ask for the decision.
If the user asked for options explicitly, show it even if Hermes has a strong recommendation.
When a decision is made, preserve enough context to prevent relitigation:
YYYY-MM-DD | what was decided | why, one lineFor strategic decisions, create or update a durable 1-3-1 decision file only inside an approved workspace. For ordinary decisions, a ledger entry or final response summary may be enough.
Do not log discussions, continuations, housekeeping, or mistake reversals as decisions.
Decision mining as a recurring cron loop belongs to mindful-hermes-continuous-improvement; this skill only governs the quality of decision framing and entries.
Use RICE only for priority order, not for choosing an approach.
Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / EaseUse when:
Do not use when there is one obvious next step or when the real issue is approach selection. Use 1-3-1 for approach selection.
references/1-3-1-framework.md — full 1-3-1 procedure, templates, and quality check.references/decision-tracking.md — when and how to log decisions in real time.references/decision-session-mining.md — quality rules for identifying missed decisions; recurring cron ownership belongs to mindful-hermes-continuous-improvement.references/rice-scoring.md — priority scoring for competing tasks.templates/quick-1-3-1.md — short chat/mobile format.templates/full-1-3-1-decision.md — full strategic decision file format.Load support files only when needed. The default path is this SKILL.md plus a concise 1-3-1.
User says: "What should we do about the communication protocol?"
Expected: give a 1-3-1 with one recommendation, or if the next action is obvious and low-risk, recommend and start.
Hermes needs approval for a command.
Expected: one short concrete reason, e.g. Need to read decision SOP files to build the Hermes skill. No multi-paragraph preamble.
Hermes drafts: A good option, B obviously bad, C absurd.
Expected: reject the 1-3-1 and investigate until three real options exist.
Hermes must choose where to place a new private runtime skill under an existing accepted category.
Expected: decide and act; report path and verification. Do not interrupt for a governance question unless the category is genuinely new or contested.
Decision affects public voice, finances, boot instructions, or destructive restructuring.
Expected: present 1-3-1 and recommendation; user decides.
User asks: "Why did we choose X?"
Expected: search/read decision records or session history before answering. Do not rely only on memory.
Before calling decision support complete:
what + why.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.