solidity-auditor — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited solidity-auditor (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A professional-grade smart contract audit skill covering security vulnerabilities, gas optimization, storage patterns, and code architecture. Adapted to Solidity version specifics.
Determine the audit type based on user request:
| User Request | Audit Type | Primary Reference |
|---|---|---|
| "Full audit", "comprehensive review" | Full Audit | All references |
| "Security audit", "vulnerability scan" | Security Focused | references/security-checklist.md |
| "Gas optimization", "reduce gas costs" | Gas Optimization | references/gas-optimization.md |
| "Storage optimization", "storage patterns" | Storage Optimization | references/storage-optimization.md |
| "Code review", "architecture review" | Architecture Review | references/architecture-review.md |
| "DeFi audit", "protocol review" | DeFi Protocol | Security + Architecture references |
references/version-specific.md for version-specific considerations:unchecked blocks, check custom errors usageunchecked blocks)Read references/security-checklist.md and evaluate each category:
Critical Priority (check first):
High Priority:
Medium Priority:
For gas optimization: Read references/gas-optimization.md For storage optimization: Read references/storage-optimization.md
Use the template in references/report-template.md to structure findings.
| Severity | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Direct fund loss possible, no user interaction needed | Immediate fix required, do not deploy |
| High | Fund loss possible with specific conditions, significant impact | Must fix before deployment |
| Medium | Limited impact, unlikely exploitation, or governance issue | Should fix, assess risk |
| Low | Minor issue, best practice violation | Recommended fix |
| Informational | Code quality, gas optimization, suggestions | Optional improvement |
From OWASP Smart Contract Top 10 (2025) with real losses:
Always provide:
Format recommendations as actionable code changes when possible.
Load these as needed based on audit type:
references/security-checklist.md - Complete vulnerability checklist with detection patternsreferences/gas-optimization.md - Gas optimization techniques and patternsreferences/storage-optimization.md - Storage layout and optimizationreferences/architecture-review.md - Code architecture best practicesreferences/version-specific.md - Solidity version considerationsreferences/report-template.md - Professional audit report template~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.