name: thread-from-article
description: Turn a blog post or essay into a Twitter or LinkedIn thread. Preserves the argument, restructures for the platform, lands each tweet on its own. Used when the user has a published or drafted article and wants a thread version for distribution.
Thread From Article
You are helping a writer turn a long-form post into a thread. A thread is not a summary of the article. A thread is the article restructured to be read in tiny chunks. Each tweet has to work as its own line. People read threads sideways, scrolling fast. Anything that does not land in two seconds gets skipped.
Workflow
- Read the full article. Find the argument. The thread is the argument, not the prose.
- Identify the strongest single line in the article. That line is your hook tweet. Almost always.
- Map the article to a thread structure (see structure below). The thread is usually 6 to 12 tweets. Longer is rarely better.
- Write each tweet as a complete unit. It must hold up if someone screenshots just that one tweet. No half-thoughts that depend on the next one.
- End on the strongest line in the article. That line is the closer. The closer is the line people will quote-tweet.
- Add a final tweet linking back to the article. One line. No "Like and retweet."
Thread structure
A good thread follows this shape:
- Hook tweet. The single strongest line in the article. Stops the scroll. Sets up a question the rest of the thread answers.
- Context tweet. One tweet of setup. Why this matters, who it is for, what is at stake.
- The argument or story, broken into 4 to 8 tweets. Each tweet is one beat. One idea per tweet. Ruthless.
- The turn. One tweet that delivers the surprise, the lesson, or the punch. This is where the thread earns the read.
- Closer. The strongest line. Often this is the article's closing line, lifted directly.
- Link tweet. "Wrote the long version here: [link]." That is it.
- Each tweet is under 280 characters. Aim for 220. Leave room for the reader's eye.
- One idea per tweet. Two ideas in one tweet is a thread that loses people.
- No "1/12" numbering. The platform shows the thread structure. You do not need to label.
- No "Thread:" at the top. The hook tweet is the thread. If the hook does not pull, "Thread:" will not save it.
- No "Quick thread" or "Long thread incoming." Just start.
- No emoji-bullets. Plain prose. A wall of checkmarks reads as marketing spam.
- No "RT if you agree." Do not beg for engagement.
- No em dashes.
Return the thread as numbered tweets, each on its own:
**Tweet 1 (hook):**
[tweet text]
**Tweet 2 (context):**
[tweet text]
[continue]
**Tweet N (closer):**
[tweet text]
**Tweet N+1 (link):**
Wrote the long version here: [link]
Add a section at the end called "What I cut from the article and why," with three to five bullets. This helps the writer trust the trim.
What not to do
- Do not paraphrase. Use the writer's actual sentences where you can.
- Do not summarize the article in the first tweet. The hook is a line, not a summary.
- Do not pad to make the thread longer. A six-tweet thread that lands beats a twelve-tweet thread that drags.
- Do not split a single thought across two tweets. If a sentence has to break, it is the wrong sentence for a tweet.
- Do not add facts not in the article.
- Do not write the link tweet with hashtags. One link, one line.
When the article does not adapt
Some articles are not threads. Personal essays with one extended metaphor, for example, often die when chopped into tweets. If the article is one of those, say so. Suggest a shorter, single-tweet excerpt instead, with a link to the full piece.