synthesize-report — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited synthesize-report (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
REPORT SYNTHESIS. Runs ONCE at end of pipeline. Sole output: synthesis/REPORT.md.
/ultra-analyzer:synthesize-report <run-path>
<run-path>/state/manifest.json<run-path>/findings/*.md — filter to those with PASS verdict in validation/findings/*.json<run-path>/topics/done/*.md — topic specs for included findings<run-path>/topics/failed/*.md — for Appendix B<run-path>/config.yaml + <run-path>/seeds.md — for coverage assessmentBefore loading anything:
du -sk <run-path>/findings/synthesis/REPORT.draft-chunks/{p1,p2,p3}.md (one chunk per priority tier, each reading only its tier's findings).For each pair in manifest.redundancy_pairs:
<run-path>/synthesis/reconcile/<pair-id>.md with outcome:pending/<name>__divergence-reconcile.md for a stronger-model retry run. DO NOT AVERAGE.Sum → 0-8. Include in report only findings with score >= 4. Score 4-5 noted as moderate evidence; >= 6 as strong.
# <Project Name> — Analyzer Report
_Generated YYYY-MM-DD, N findings included, M excluded as FAIL, K divergent pairs._
## §0 Evidence bases (MANDATORY FIRST SECTION)
<Denominator accounting from T000-equivalent finding if present.>
<Every subsequent percentage must specify subset, NOT bare "% of users".>
## Executive summary
<3-6 paragraphs, P1 first.>
## Top N for the decision-maker call
<For each of top N (N=5 by default, configurable) most-compelling findings:>
- Headline (specific, quantitative, <20 words)
- Narrative interpretation (2-3 sentences — correlation framing only, never causation)
- Supporting quotes (1-2 verbatim, ≤200 chars, with citation anchor)
- Confidence + evidence weight
## P1: <primary domain — most detail>
### Finding 1.1 ...
## P2: <secondary domain — compressed>
## P3: <tertiary — appendix-style tables>
## Curated quotes
<10 verbatim ≤200 chars each, chosen to illustrate P1 patterns.>
## Divergent findings requiring human review
<From triangulation DIVERGENT outcomes. Never hidden by averaging.>
## Honest-ambiguity statement
<If the P1 answer is weak or ambiguous, say so explicitly. Do NOT manufacture a thesis to meet expectations.>
## Audit-trail note
<One paragraph: every number in this report traces to a topic file in topics/done/, queries listed in the topic, and validator verdict in validation/findings/. Fully reproducible.>
## Appendix A — Topics run
<Table: topic ID, priority, complexity, model, verdict, one-line summary.>
## Appendix B — Topics failed
<Table: topic ID, reason, retry count.>
## Appendix C — Coverage
<Table: unit (collection/file/etc.), topic count, notes.>## Contradictions with hypothesis section (closes M-5). The validator's Step 3a refuses such findings at verdict time, but synthesize-report MUST re-check at compose time as defense-in-depth: any included finding whose contradictions body is whitespace-only or matches a placeholder (none / n/a / tbd / pending / -) FAILs the report compose with reason empty-contradictions in TNNN. Re-run validator on those topics first.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.