technical-debt-management — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited technical-debt-management (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Any task involving debt identification, classification, prioritization, ROI-based refactoring, budget allocation, code health scoring, or payoff planning.
tech-debt label + severity + affected area.| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Deliberate + Prudent | "We know, ship now, fix Sprint N" | Hardcoded config needing config service |
| Deliberate + Reckless | "We know, don't care" | Skipping auth "because VPN" |
| Inadvertent + Prudent | "Didn't know better then" | Hand-rolled state before finding library |
| Inadvertent + Reckless | "Didn't know what we were doing" | N+1 queries from ORM misuse |
Weekly Interest = incidents_caused * avg_hours
+ developer_workaround_time
+ onboarding_friction
+ blocked_feature_delaysPriority Score = interest_per_sprint / effort_to_fix_hours
Higher score = fix first (best ROI)Health = test_coverage(25%) + dependency_freshness(20%)
+ complexity(25%) + documentation(15%) + incident_inverse(15%)~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.