code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill performs thorough code reviews analyzing security, performance, architecture, and best practices.
Use this skill when the user asks to:
Always provide review in this structure:
## 📋 Code Review: [filename]
### ✅ Passed
- [List of good practices found]
### ⚠️ Warnings
- [List of potential issues]
- Severity: [Low/Medium/High/Critical]
### ❌ Issues
- [List of problems to fix]
- Suggested fix: [Description]
### 💡 Suggestions
- [List of improvements]
### 📊 Metrics
- Lines of code: [N]
- Complexity: [Low/Medium/High]
- Test coverage: [N%]User: "Review src/user.service.ts"
Response:
## 📋 Code Review: src/user.service.ts
### ✅ Passed
- Good use of dependency injection
- Proper error handling with try-catch
### ⚠️ Warnings
- Method `findByEmail` could benefit from indexing (Medium)
- Consider adding pagination to `findAll` (Low)
### ❌ Issues
- **SQL Injection Risk**: Line 45 uses string concatenation
- Fix: Use parameterized queries
### 💡 Suggestions
- Extract validation to separate class
- Add unit tests for critical methods~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.