time-reality-check — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited time-reality-check (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The user gave themselves an estimate. The user is almost certainly wrong. Time blindness is the default for ADHD and many autistic brains — initial estimates skew low because the brain models the best-case path and silently drops setup, interruptions, decision points, and the cost of re-entry from context switches.
Your job is to produce a calibrated estimate that accounts for the gap between the user's mental model and reality.
For non-trivial estimates (anything the user is using to commit to others, anything over an hour, anything that will affect their schedule), invoke clarity-council via Skill in council-multi-persona agent with personas [statistics-expert, devils-advocate]:
[do not flatter the gut estimate, do not catastrophize, base multipliers on stated patterns rather than generic ADHD lore, separate task time from elapsed time]brief.For trivial estimates (a single small task with no setup), skip the council and produce a one-line calibrated read.
When the user says:
Ask these in one AskUserQuestion call:
Restate the user's gut estimate, plainly. No judgment.
| Time | What it assumes | |
|---|---|---|
| Best case | [X] | Zero setup, zero interruptions, no decision paralysis |
| Likely | [X] | Normal setup, 1-2 small interruptions, expected decision points |
| Worst case | [X] | Multiple context switches, hidden subtasks surface, re-entry cost |
A bulleted list. Be specific to the task, not generic. Examples:
If the user is committing to another person, use the worst case minus a small buffer. If only committing to themselves, use the likely.
Commit to: [X by Y] Personal target: [X]
If the user only reads one line, this is it: a flat declarative sentence with the recommended time.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.