interest-capture — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited interest-capture (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A new idea, project, rabbit hole, or hyperfixation just lit up in the user's brain. If they chase it now, today's actual work is gone. If they ignore it, it'll either be forgotten by lunch or rattle in their head for hours stealing attention. The answer is fast capture — get it down with enough fidelity to resume later, then go back to what they were doing.
Speed is the whole point. A council call adds latency that defeats the purpose. Always run inline.
When the user says:
One question, fast:
What's the idea? (One sentence is fine. I'll capture, tag, file, and send you back to what you were doing.)
If the user already dumped the idea in the trigger message, skip the question and go straight to capture.
A short note with this exact shape — no more, no less:
---
captured: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
status: stashed
tags:
- hyperfixation
- [topic-tag-1]
- [topic-tag-2]
---
# {{title — 5-8 words, descriptive}}
## The idea
{{one paragraph, in the user's words where possible}}
## Why it lit up
{{one sentence — what was the trigger? a thing they read, a problem at work, a connection to another project}}
## Next concrete step if I come back to this
{{one literal action — "read X", "spike a script that does Y", "talk to Z" — not a plan, an action}}
## Linked
- [[{{related-existing-note-if-any}}]]Delegate to obsidian-vault skill. The note goes in the user's 📥 Inbox/ (or equivalent capture folder — check the vault config). Filename: YYYY-MM-DD-{{kebab-title}}.md.
If the user doesn't use Obsidian, fall back to writing the file to ~/captures/ and tell the user the path.
One line. Maximum two.
Captured: [[2026-05-19-rust-async-runtimes-comparison]] — #hyperfixation #rust #async. Back to what you were doing.That's it. No "great idea!", no expansion, no follow-up questions. Send them back.
task-initiation instead. Capture is for not acting now.## Re-surfaced YYYY-MM-DD section to it instead of creating a new file.clarity-council — latency kills the use case~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.