hyperfocus-recovery — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited hyperfocus-recovery (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The user just surfaced from a deep work session, or got pulled away for an hour, and now has no idea where they were. Their brain went elsewhere; the context is gone. Your job is to reconstruct it from the artifacts they left behind.
When the user says:
This is forensic reconstruction, not interpretation. A council call would add noise. Run inline.
Run these in parallel, take what works, ignore what doesn't:
find . -mmin -240 -type f -not -path './.git/*' (or platform equivalent)One paragraph reconstructing the apparent goal from the evidence. Cite specific files and changes. Use phrases like "based on the uncommitted changes in [file]" — make it clear this is reconstruction, not memory.
A bulleted list of the active threads, ranked by recency and certainty:
Surface any TODO / FIXME / XXX / // TEMP comments in recently-touched files, with file:line links. These are usually the most reliable signal of intent.
Pick the smallest, most concrete next action. Same shape as task-initiation output — one literal thing, ≤30 seconds:
To get back in, do this: [Opensrc/foo.tsline 47. Read the// TODO: handle empty casecomment. That's where you were.]
If the user wants to start fresh and abandon what they were doing, offer that as an alternative:
Or: if you want to drop this thread, [`git stash`] and I can help you pick something new.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.