triple-loop-learning — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited triple-loop-learning (Agent Skill) and scored it 87/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 3 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 3 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill requires Python 3.8+ and standard library only.
Evaluation gate: NOT included in this primitive. The calling system (e.g., agent-agentic-os os-improvement-loop) is responsible for wrapping this skill with an eval gate and experiment log.
This skill defines the orchestration pattern for the Triple-Loop Architecture. Pattern 5 is a robust, autonomous feedback loop where an independent Meta-Learning Orchestrator governs a long-horizon pipeline of execution, planning, and tactical problem-solving.
This architecture is entirely framework-agnostic. While originally developed for agent-agentic-os, it models the core loop defined by Meta-Harness research where autonomous systems evolve their own operating instructions based strictly on headless evaluators.
flowchart TD
subgraph Outer["Outer Loop (Meta-Learning & Orchestration)"]
Hypothesize[Hypothesis Generation] --> StrategyBridge[Strategy Packet]
Report --> EvalBridge[Score Analysis]
EvalBridge --> Conclude[Accept / Reject Hypothesis]
end
subgraph Mid["Strategic Planner (Dual-Loop Integration)"]
Plan[Define Sub-tasks] --> TacticalBridge[Handoff Packet]
Result[Aggregate Results] --> Report[Generate Report]
end
subgraph Inner["Tactical Executor (Single-Loop Integration)"]
Execute[Code Mutation] --> Test[Headless Evaluation]
Test --> ResultBridge[Pass/Fail Signal]
end
StrategyBridge --> Plan
TacticalBridge --> Execute
ResultBridge --> Resultagy, claude, copilot, etc.) and the specific model to run mutations and evaluation.< /dev/null to commands) are defined to prevent SIGTTIN process freezes.Constraint: Subjective LLM analysis is expressly prohibited.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.