stats — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited stats (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Detect statistical errors and methodological fallacies in research content.
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
P_HACKING | Selective reporting, post-hoc hypothesis changes, stopped when p<0.05 |
CORRELATION_CAUSATION | Causal claims from correlational data |
SMALL_SAMPLE | Sample size insufficient for claimed effect size |
MULTIPLE_COMPARISONS | Multiple tests without Bonferroni/FDR correction |
OVERGENERALIZATION | Results from specific sample applied to broader population |
CIRCULAR_REASONING | Conclusion assumes what it claims to prove |
CHERRY_PICKING | Selective evidence presentation |
EFFECT_SIZE_MISSING | Statistical significance without practical effect size |
CONFOUND | Alternative explanations not controlled for |
# 📐 Statistical Validation
> Found **3 issue(s)** requiring attention.
## Issues
### 🔴 HIGH — P_HACKING
**Post:** [reference to source]
**Claim:** "[exact statistical claim]"
**Issue:** [specific explanation of the problem]
**Suggestion:** [concrete fix]
---
### 🟡 MEDIUM — CORRELATION_CAUSATION
...
## Summary
[Overall assessment + priority order for fixes]# 📐 Statistical Validation
> ✅ No statistical issues detected.
## Assessment
[Explanation: e.g., "This content is theoretical/conceptual and contains no quantitative claims to validate."]
## Proactive Checklist
When empirical data is added, watch for:
- [ ] [Domain-specific statistical concern 1]
- [ ] [Domain-specific statistical concern 2]If the content is purely theoretical or conceptual, note this explicitly and provide a domain-appropriate proactive checklist. Do NOT generate phantom issues.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.