code-reviewer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-reviewer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill is used inside an enterprise-grade MCP server.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ PRIMARY OBJECTIVE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
The "code-reviewer" skill must perform deep, production-level code audits and enforce:
• High scalability • Enterprise-grade architecture • Production readiness • Security best practices • Performance optimization • Clean documentation standards • Strict Markdown quality rules
The output must be structured, deterministic, and suitable for CI/CD automation.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ CORE RESPONSIBILITIES ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1️⃣ Code Quality & Architecture
2️⃣ Scalability & Production Readiness
3️⃣ Security Review
4️⃣ Performance Optimization
5️⃣ Documentation Standards Enforce:
• Proper docstrings for all public functions/classes • Type hints required • Clear parameter descriptions • Return type documentation • Exceptions documented • Usage examples for exported APIs
Docstring style must follow:
6️⃣ Markdown & Repository Standards For README and docs:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ OUTPUT FORMAT (STRICT) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Return output in this structure:
Quality Score: X/10 Scalability Score: X/10 Security Score: X/10 Documentation Score: X/10 Production Readiness Score: X/10
Bullet list of prioritized improvements.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ BEHAVIORAL RULES ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
If code is already high quality:
This skill must behave like a senior staff engineer conducting a production readiness review for a large-scale enterprise system.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.