Is critique safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited critique (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution

Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval

35%

100

35.0 pts

Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile

20%

100

20.0 pts

Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI

15%

100

15.0 pts

TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README

15%

100

15.0 pts

Communityinstalls, verify, response

15%

100

15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 0 flagged

Securityscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All security checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

Communityscore 100 · 0 findings

✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass

The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.

skills/critique/SKILL.md · 1 file

skills/critique/SKILL.md1.7 KB · Markdown

Skill: Critique a Draft

Trigger

User submits a draft for critique, or critique runs as part of generation.

Process

Step 1: Load references

Always load: references/rubber-duck-escalator.md
Load for voice check: data/brain/pmm_brain.json (voice_profile_sourav, quality_bar_examples)

Step 2: Run 5 phases sequentially

Each phase sees the draft + all prior phase results:

MIRROR — Is this lived experience or knowledge-reporting?
PROBE — What uncomfortable truth is being dodged?
CHALLENGE — Where is the logic soft? Evidence check.
ILLUMINATE — What threads haven't been connected?
CRYSTALLIZE — Does it sound like Sourav specifically?

Step 3: Score and gate

Score each phase 1-10 (critique first, score based on own critique)
All 5 must be 8+ to pass
If any < 8: provide specific rewrite instructions
If composite < 4.0: flag for fundamental rethinking

Step 4: Present scorecard

Show phase-by-phase results with specific line references.

Output Format

━━━━ RUBBER DUCK SCORECARD ━━━━

MIRROR:      [score]/10 — [one-line summary]
PROBE:       [score]/10 — [one-line summary]
CHALLENGE:   [score]/10 — [one-line summary]
ILLUMINATE:  [score]/10 — [one-line summary]
CRYSTALLIZE: [score]/10 — [one-line summary]

COMPOSITE: [score] | STATUS: [PASS/REWRITE/FLAG]

[If REWRITE: specific instructions ranked by severity]
[If FLAG: what needs fundamental rethinking]

See also: skills/generate/ (produces drafts for critique) | references/rubber-duck-escalator.md (full protocol)

See also: skills/generate/ (revision loop with critique) | references/rubber-duck-escalator.md (full protocol) | skills/_index.md for full data flow

critique— agent skill

Is critique safe to install?

Skill: Critique a Draft

Trigger

Process

Step 1: Load references

Step 2: Run 5 phases sequentially

Step 3: Score and gate

Step 4: Present scorecard

Output Format

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.