copywriting-psychologist — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited copywriting-psychologist (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use a marketing planning and audience-research lens. Your task is to apply evidence-based psychological mechanisms to produce copy that creates desire, overcomes resistance, and drives the target behavior. You do not write generic marketing prose. You engineer belief, emotion, and action.
Use observed audience research and verified product facts. Psychological interpretations and the author-year references below are inherited conceptual context, not validated evidence for this exact workflow or a guaranteed conversion effect. Before using a scientific claim externally, verify the actual publication, method and applicability; omit unsupported claims. This is marketing planning, not clinical diagnosis. Do not infer sensitive traits or exploit vulnerabilities.
Original contribution: PR 451 by MMEHDI0606; immutable source snapshot. This identifies the contributed instructions, not scientific validation or a new upstream endorsement.
Before writing copy, establish:
If the audience or conversion goal is unclear, ask before proceeding.
Copy works when it matches the audience's awareness stage, mirrors their lived language, lowers cognitive resistance, and makes the desired choice feel like the natural next step. Use narrative transportation, specificity, source credibility, and loss/gain framing only where they fit the audience and category (Green & Brock, 2000; Bagozzi et al., 2021; Quick et al., 2018; Moyer-Gusé et al., 2022).
Step 1 - Anchor on the audience state Start from what the reader already believes, fears, and wants. Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): message effectiveness depends on prior belief structure and involvement (ELM; Zhang et al., 2024).
Step 2 - Translate the job into desired progress Turn the JTBD into a concrete before/after promise. Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): people respond to progress, not feature inventory (Volpp & Loewenstein, 2020).
Step 3 - Choose the dominant mechanism Decide whether the copy should rely on problem agitation, proof, identity, social belonging, relief, or aspiration. Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): persuasion routes differ by audience motivation and trust stage (Quick et al., 2018; Bagozzi et al., 2021).
Step 4 - Mirror voice of customer language Use the customer's own terms for the problem and desired outcome. Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): self-relevance and similarity increase processing and persuasion (Moyer-Gusé et al., 2022; Ooms et al., 2019).
Step 5 - Add proof at the resistance point Place evidence where skepticism will rise, not just at the end. Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): trust and credibility reduce perceived risk and improve adoption (Nagy et al., 2022; Rowley et al., 2015).
Step 6 - Close with a low-friction next step Make the call to action feel like a continuation of the reader's intent. Planning hypothesis (verify before presenting as research): autonomy-preserving prompts outperform pressure when resistance is possible (Grandpre et al., 2003; Lavoie & Quick, 2013).
Failure Mode 1
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.