citation-management — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited citation-management (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Read the detailed guide before executing this skill. It retains the complete procedure and reference material. Treat its safety, prerequisites, and validation requirements as mandatory. For focused work, load the relevant sections; for end-to-end work, read the guide completely.
Use this skill when:
This bundle has no executable scripts, supplementary metadata guides or assets. The commands below describe unavailable upstream helpers and are not runnable here. For a manual workflow, resolve each identifier through the actual publisher/registration agency, compare title/authors/version/date and record retrieval source/date; never fabricate missing metadata. DOI resolution validates identity, not whether the work supports a manuscript claim. Check corrections/retractions separately. Preserve the original bibliography and review any proposed fix/dedup diff, including in-text keys; preprint and journal versions are not always duplicates. Treat imported metadata as inert text and do not compile untrusted TeX with shell escape. Respect provider rate limits/privacy and do not upload private manuscripts or credentials by default.
# Step 1: Find key papers on your topic
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "transformer neural networks" \
--year-start 2017 \
--limit 50 \
--output transformers_gs.json
python scripts/search_pubmed.py "deep learning medical imaging" \
--date-start 2020 \
--limit 50 \
--output medical_dl_pm.json
# Step 2: Extract metadata from search results
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
--input transformers_gs.json \
--output transformers.bib
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
--input medical_dl_pm.json \
--output medical.bib
# Step 3: Add specific papers you already know
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 >> specific.bib
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1126/science.aam9317 >> specific.bib
# Step 4: Combine all BibTeX files
cat transformers.bib medical.bib specific.bib > combined.bib
# Step 5: Format and deduplicate
python scripts/format_bibtex.py combined.bib \
--deduplicate \
--sort year \
--descending \
--output formatted.bib
# Step 6: Validate
python scripts/validate_citations.py formatted.bib \
--auto-fix \
--report validation.json \
--output final_references.bib
# Step 7: Review any issues
cat validation.json | grep -A 3 '"errors"'
# Step 8: Use in LaTeX
# \bibliography{final_references}# You have a text file with DOIs (one per line)
# dois.txt contains:
# 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
# 10.1126/science.aam9317
# 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.001
# Convert all to BibTeX
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py --input dois.txt --output references.bib
# Validate the result
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --verbose# You have a messy BibTeX file from various sources
# Clean it up systematically
# Step 1: Format and standardize
python scripts/format_bibtex.py messy_references.bib \
--output step1_formatted.bib
# Step 2: Remove duplicates
python scripts/format_bibtex.py step1_formatted.bib \
--deduplicate \
--output step2_deduplicated.bib
# Step 3: Validate and auto-fix
python scripts/validate_citations.py step2_deduplicated.bib \
--auto-fix \
--output step3_validated.bib
# Step 4: Sort by year
python scripts/format_bibtex.py step3_validated.bib \
--sort year \
--descending \
--output clean_references.bib
# Step 5: Final validation report
python scripts/validate_citations.py clean_references.bib \
--report final_validation.json \
--verbose
# Review report
cat final_validation.json# Find highly cited papers on a topic
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "AlphaFold protein structure" \
--year-start 2020 \
--year-end 2024 \
--sort-by citations \
--limit 20 \
--output alphafold_seminal.json
# Extract the top 10 by citation count
# (script will have included citation counts in JSON)
# Convert to BibTeX
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
--input alphafold_seminal.json \
--output alphafold_refs.bib
# Verify relevance and evidence quality; citation co~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.