broken-authentication — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited broken-authentication (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Identify and exploit authentication and session management vulnerabilities in web applications. Broken authentication consistently ranks in the OWASP Top 10 and can lead to account takeover, identity theft, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems. This skill covers testing methodologies for password policies, session handling, multi-factor authentication, and credential management.
Understand the application's authentication architecture:
# Identify authentication type
- Password-based (forms, basic auth, digest)
- Token-based (JWT, OAuth, API keys)
- Certificate-based (mutual TLS)
- Multi-factor (SMS, TOTP, hardware tokens)
# Map authentication endpoints
/login, /signin, /authenticate
/register, /signup
/forgot-password, /reset-password
/logout, /signout
/api/auth/*, /oauth/*Capture and analyze authentication requests:
POST /login HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
username=test&password=test123Evaluate password requirements and enforcement:
# Test minimum length (a, ab, abcdefgh)
# Test complexity (password, password1, Password1!)
# Test common weak passwords (123456, password, qwerty, admin)
# Test username as password (admin/admin, test/test)Document policy gaps: Minimum length <8, no complexity, common passwords allowed, username as password.
Test for username enumeration vulnerabilities:
# Compare responses for valid vs invalid usernames
# Invalid: "Invalid username" vs Valid: "Invalid password"
# Check timing differences, response codes, registration messages"Email sent if account exists" (secure) "No account with that email" (leaks info)
{"error": "user_not_found"} {"error": "invalid_password"}
### Phase 4: Brute Force Testing
Test account lockout and rate limiting:
hydra -l admin -P /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt \ target.com http-post-form \ "/login:username=^USER^&password=^PASS^:Invalid credentials"
Check for protections:
### Phase 5: Credential Stuffing
Test with known breached credentials:
### Phase 6: Session Management Testing
Analyze session token security:
Cookie: SESSIONID=abc123def456
Session token analysis:
#!/usr/bin/env python3 import requests import hashlib
tokens = [] for i in range(100): response = requests.get("https://target.com/login") token = response.cookies.get("SESSIONID") tokens.append(token)
### Phase 7: Session Fixation Testing
Test if session is regenerated after authentication:
GET /login HTTP/1.1 Response: Set-Cookie: SESSIONID=abc123
POST /login HTTP/1.1 Cookie: SESSIONID=ab
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.