training-check-8e06f8 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited training-check-8e06f8 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are now in interactive watch / 交互式训练监控模式.
Keep the current session open and report directly in the current terminal. The user is watching this terminal for updates. By default, run a training health check every 30 minutes, output a concise but complete analysis report after each check, state the next check time, then continue monitoring.
This skill checks training quality, not basic process health. Process health checks such as whether a tmux session exists or whether the GPU is idle can be handled by watchdog-style tooling; this skill focuses on whether the run is still worth continuing.
Before the first check, identify or ask for the minimum monitoring context:
If a source is unavailable, say so clearly and continue with the available source. If both WandB and fallback logs are unreachable, report the connectivity issue, classify the round as WAIT, and check again later. Do not infer that training is bad only because data is unreachable.
Every round, read WandB first when configured. If WandB is unreachable, read the fallback logs. Inspect at least:
Output one report in the current terminal with this structure:
## Training Check - <local timestamp>
- Data source: wandb_ok | log_fallback | unreachable
- Run: <wandb run or training identifier>
- Recent metrics: <loss/eval/lr/grad summary>
- Anomalies: <NaN/Inf/spike/divergence/plateau findings>
- Evidence: <WandB URL, log lines, metric values, or files inspected>
- Decision: CONTINUE | WAIT | STOP
- Reason: <why this decision is justified>
- Next check: <local timestamp, normally 30 minutes later unless ending>Use the decisions as follows:
| Decision | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
CONTINUE | Run looks healthy enough to keep training. | Keep monitoring and check again in 30 minutes. |
WAIT | Evidence is inconclusive, noisy, too early, or temporarily unreachable. | Do not stop training; keep monitoring and check again later. |
STOP | Training is clearly problematic or no longer worth continuing. | Stop the training task, save evidence, write notes, output final summary, and end monitoring. |
When the decision is STOP:
stop_command, run stop_command first.stop_command is available, choose the appropriate stop action from how the training was launched, such as stopping the relevant tmux session, local process, remote process, scheduler job, or notebook job.FINAL_SUMMARY in the terminal.Never stop on the first sign of ordinary metric noise. Look for sustained trends, hard failures, or clear divergence. Always preserve enough evidence for a later agent or human to understand why the run was stopped.
CONTINUE, announce the next check time and wait until then.WAIT, explain what evidence is missing or noisy and check again later. Use a shorter interval only when the run looks suspicious but not yet stop-worthy.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.