paper-talk — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited paper-talk (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Workflow: from a completed paper to a conference-ready talk artifact — slide outline, Beamer source, editable PPTX, speaker notes, full talk script, polished visuals, and assurance checks.
Pipeline target: $ARGUMENTS
The skill takes an explicit — assurance: argument; default is polished.
| Level | Phases run | Use when |
|---|---|---|
draft | 0 → 1 → 2 → 5 → 6 | Internal practice talk; quick first-pass deck |
polished (default) | 0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 5 → 6 | Lab seminar, workshop, default conference talk |
conference-ready (or submission) | 0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 | Top-venue oral / spotlight where slide claims are scrutinised; or anonymous submission |
Phase 4 (assurance checks) is opt-in via — assurance: conference-ready. The lower levels skip claim / citation / anonymity audits, which is correct when content has already been audited at the paper-writing stage.
These are non-negotiable across all phases:
paper/main.tex or other paper artifacts./paper-slides produces a baseline deck; /slides-polish writes a _polished versioned copy. The original Beamer + PPTX are never overwritten.slide.notes_slide content. Phase 4 verifies this.PAPER_DIR/ artefacts) or explicitly user-provided. The pipeline never invents content during outline, build, polish, audit, or export. Phase-4 anonymity scan + claim audit verify this end-to-end./slides-polish use fresh threads (no codex-reply). See ../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md.../shared-references/experiment-integrity.md.— reference: PDF or — style: preset informs visual weight and structural rhythm; never copy prose, examples, slide titles, or speaker-note text from the reference.effort levels for any Codex call invoked by sub-skills./paper-slides./paper-slides./paper-slides color schemes when — style is not passed)./paper-slides.generic if not passed; why-rf and venue presets supported by /slides-polish.assurance ≥ polished. The Beamer compile of this talk is an acceptable self-reference; an external academic talk PDF is preferred when the user wants visual alignment beyond defaults.true only when explicitly requested.Discovered from $ARGUMENTS and the project directory:
main.tex + main.pdf). The paper must already be in good shape; this workflow does not write the paper./slides-polish. If absent and the assurance level requires polish, the workflow uses the Beamer self-compile as reference.File names match /paper-slides's emit contract — this workflow is a non-renaming consumer.
slides/
├── SLIDE_OUTLINE.md # Phase-1 outline (claim-first per slide)
├── main.tex # Beamer source (from /paper-slides)
├── main.pdf # compiled Beamer
├── presentation.pptx # editable PPTX (from /paper-slides; emit name fixed by /paper-slides)
├── presentation_pre_polish.pptx # snapshot before /slides-polish
├── presentation_polished.pptx # /slides-polish output (when assurance ≥ polished)
├── presentation_polished.pdf # rendered (LibreOffice or user-export)
├── speaker_notes.md # per-slide notes (from /paper-slides)
├── TALK_SCRIPT.md # full word-for-word talk script + Q&A (from /paper-slides)
└── assets/ # per-slide PNG previews
.aris/paper-talk/
├── PIPELINE_STATE.json # phase pointer, status, timestamps
├── FINAL_REPORT.md # human-readable summary at end
├── audit-input/ # Phase-4 staging copies of slide text + notes + script (so /paper-claim-audit and /citation-audit can run on slide content as a synthetic "paper")
│ ├── main.tex # \input{sections/slide_text.tex} \input{sections/notes.tex} \input{sections/script.tex}
│ ├── sections/
│ │ ├── slide_text.tex # all visible slide bullets/titles/callouts as \section{Slide K}
│ │ ├── notes.tex # speaker_notes.md → LaTeX, one \section per slide
│ │ └── script.tex # TALK_SCRIPT.md → LaTeX, one \section per slide
│ ├── references.bib → ../../../paper/references.bib # symlink to source paper bib for /citation-audit
│ ├── results/ → ../../../paper/results/ # symlink — claim audit needs real evidence
│ └── figures/ → ../../../paper/figures/ # symlink — citation audit may reference figure captions
└── audits/
├── slide_claim_audit.json # 6-state verdict per claim (PASS/WARN/FAIL/NOT_APPLICABLE/BLOCKED/ERROR)
├── citation_audit.json # citation existence / metadata
├── anonymity_scan.json # placeholder discipline check
└── export_integrity.json # page-count / aspect / blank-slide / notes-preservedThe audit JSON files follow the shared 6-state schema; see ../shared-references/assurance-contract.md.
ls $PAPER_DIR/main.tex $PAPER_DIR/main.pdf. If absent → halt and ask user to point to the compiled paper.which xelatex pdflatex latexmkwhich soffice (LibreOffice headless) — required for Phase 4 export integrity check; otherwise prompt user to export PDF manually.which pdfinfo pdftoppm (poppler) — required for /slides-polish PNG rendering.python3 -c 'import pptx').$ARGUMENTS: talk_type, minutes, assurance, reference, style, effort..aris/paper-talk/PIPELINE_STATE.json with phase: 0, timestamp, all resolved overrides.slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md exists and PIPELINE_STATE.json shows recent in-progress work, prompt the user — resume from last phase or start fresh.Goal: produce or accept a slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md that the user signs off on before any deck-building happens.
If slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md already exists, present its summary (slide count, time budget, claim-per-slide map) to the user and ask:
"Use existing outline (Y/n)? Modify? Regenerate?"
Otherwise, delegate to /paper-slides Phase-1 only (content extraction + slide outline generation). /paper-slides writes the outline into its own state; we adopt it as slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md.
The outline must contain, per slide:
Checkpoint: present the outline. Default behavior: pause for user approval. Set AUTO_PROCEED = true only when the user is explicitly running unattended.
Invoke /paper-slides to generate Beamer source + PPTX from the approved outline.
/paper-slides "<paper-dir>" — talk_type: <T> — minutes: <N> — venue: <V> — aspect: 16:9 — notes: trueForward — style-ref: if the user originally passed it (writer-side; the reviewer-side polish in Phase 3 must NOT see it — see invariant 8).
/paper-slides produces (emit names fixed by /paper-slides):
slides/main.tex + slides/main.pdf (Beamer)slides/presentation.pptx (editable PPTX)slides/speaker_notes.mdslides/TALK_SCRIPT.mdAfter return: verify the four artefacts exist. If any missing, halt with a diagnostic. Do not rename outputs — downstream phases bind to these exact paths.
Skip when assurance == draft.
Invoke /slides-polish against the freshly generated PPTX, with a reference. If the user passed — reference:, use that. Otherwise, use the Beamer compile (slides/main.pdf) as the visual reference — the Beamer is the design intent for the same talk, so it is the correct anchor when no external reference is available.
/slides-polish "slides/presentation.pptx" — reference: slides/main.pdf — style: <preset> — effort: <effort>After return: verify slides/presentation_polished.pptx exists; if rendering tools are available, also verify slides/presentation_polished.pdf.
The polish phase is read-only on content (see Hard Invariants). If /slides-polish emits a BLOCKED verdict because a Codex fix proposal would alter content, surface that block to the user and halt rather than overriding.
Skip when assurance ∈ {draft, polished}.
/paper-claim-audit and /citation-audit expect a paper-shaped input (paper/main.tex + paper/sections/*.tex + paper/results/) and emit JSON under paper/. Slides have a different shape, so this phase first stages slide artefacts into a synthetic paper directory, then invokes the audits against that synthetic input. Verdicts are written under .aris/paper-talk/audits/ using the shared 6-state schema (PASS, WARN, FAIL, NOT_APPLICABLE, BLOCKED, ERROR) — see ../shared-references/assurance-contract.md.
#### 4.0 Staging adapter
The staged "paper" mirrors /paper-claim-audit and /citation-audit's expected layout: main.tex at the root that \input{}s sections/*.tex, plus a .bib file and results/+figures/ symlinks.
.aris/paper-talk/audit-input/
├── main.tex
│ # contains: \input{sections/slide_text.tex}
│ # \input{sections/notes.tex}
│ # \input{sections/script.tex}
│ # \bibliography{references}
├── sections/
│ ├── slide_text.tex # one \section{Slide K — <title>} per slide; visible bullets, titles, callout text, in-slide \cite{...}
│ ├── notes.tex # speaker_notes.md converted to LaTeX, one \section per slide
│ └── script.tex # TALK_SCRIPT.md converted to LaTeX, one \section per slide
├── references.bib → ../../../paper/references.bib # symlink to source paper bib (or copy if symlink not allowed)
├── results/ → ../../../paper/results/ # symlink — claim audit needs real evidence
└── figures/ → ../../../paper/figures/ # symlink — citation audit may reference figure captionsIf the source paper uses a different bib name (e.g., paper.bib), mirror the actual file. If multiple bibs are used, link them all.
The staged "paper" exists only for the duration of Phase 4 and is removed in Phase 6 unless the user passes — keep-audit-input.
#### 4.1 Slide claim audit
Invoke /paper-claim-audit against the staged input. Scope is slide text + speaker notes + full talk script — talks often smuggle unsupported claims into spoken parts that the visible bullets don't show.
/paper-claim-audit ".aris/paper-talk/audit-input"The audit emits audit-input/PAPER_CLAIM_AUDIT.json with the shared 6-state schema. Move it to .aris/paper-talk/audits/slide_claim_audit.json and de-stage the path prefix so the verdicts cite slide K rather than synthetic-paper sections.
A FAIL or BLOCKED verdict on any claim downgrades the Phase-6 final verdict from conference-ready to polished.
#### 4.2 Citation audit
Invoke /citation-audit over the staged input. Verify any \cite{...} in slides + notes + script via DBLP / CrossRef; flag fabricated entries.
/citation-audit ".aris/paper-talk/audit-input"Output → .aris/paper-talk/audits/citation_audit.json (6-state).
#### 4.3 Anonymity scan
When the talk is for an anonymous-submission venue or the user passed — anonymous, scan slides + notes + script for:
[anonymized],Withheld for anonymous review, etc.).
Output → .aris/paper-talk/audits/anonymity_scan.json (6-state). Any FAIL (real-content leak) blocks conference-ready.
Resolve the final PPTX path:
FINAL_PPTX = slides/presentation_polished.pptx if Phase 3 ran
= slides/presentation.pptx if assurance == draft (Phase 3 skipped)Then:
cd slides && latexmk -pdf -xelatex main.tex (or pdflatex for non-CJK). Confirm main.pdf page count matches outline slide count.soffice --headless --convert-to pdf <FINAL_PPTX> -outdir slides/. If unavailable, prompt user..aris/paper-talk/audits/export_integrity.json (6-state):presentation_pre_polish.pptx's notes; when Phase 3 skipped, against presentation.pptx's own notes (no-op).If any integrity check fails, downgrade the Phase-6 verdict and surface specifics to the user.
Write .aris/paper-talk/FINAL_REPORT.md with:
draft | polished | conference-ready (downgraded if audits failed).A final conference-ready verdict requires:
PASS (or NOT_APPLICABLE when theaudit's content detector did not match — e.g., no citations on slides). Any WARN, FAIL, BLOCKED, or ERROR downgrades the verdict.
PASS.FAIL when anonymous submission is declared.Otherwise the report emits the highest passing level (polished or draft) and itemises why conference-ready was not granted, citing the specific audit JSON and the failing verdict line.
See ../shared-references/effort-contract.md.
effort | Behavior |
|---|---|
lite | Forwarded to sub-skills. /slides-polish runs in lite (BLOCKERS only). Phase 4 still runs at the requested assurance level — effort controls depth, never audit gating (see ../shared-references/assurance-contract.md). |
balanced (default) | Standard pipeline. /slides-polish runs balanced. |
max | /slides-polish runs max (per-page review on every slide). Phase-4 audits read all artefacts in full. |
beast | /slides-polish runs beast (second polish round). Phase-4 audits include extended assurance checks; final report adds an executive summary. |
reasoning_effort: xhigh is invariant.
assurance and effort are independent axes. The user may legally combine effort: lite, assurance: conference-ready to mean "fast pipeline, but every audit must emit a verdict before finalisation."
/paper-talk "paper/" — talk_type: oral — minutes: 25 — assurance: conference-ready \
— reference: ./refs/why_rf_2025.pdf — style: why-rf — effort: maxForwarded to:
/paper-slides (Phase 2): paper-dir, talk_type, minutes, venue, aspect, notes, style-ref if writer-side./slides-polish (Phase 3): polished pptx target, reference, style, effort./paper-claim-audit (Phase 4.1): scoped to slide deck artefacts (not paper)./citation-audit (Phase 4.2): scoped to slide-deck-only citations./paper-writing first./paper-poster./slides-polish directly — /paper-talk would needlessly rebuild./paper-slides directly with manual outline./paper-slides, /slides-polish, /paper-claim-audit, /citation-audit./kill-argument by default — that is upstream intellectual stress-test, not deck QA. Users who want talk-story stress-test before slide build can run /kill-argument paper/ first./paper-writing (paper) and /paper-poster (poster).This workflow generalises a 30+ iteration polish run on a Chinese-spoken academic conference talk (May 2026). The convergent learning was that talk preparation has the same shape as paper preparation — plan, build, polish, audit, export, report — and benefits from the same assurance ladder. The per-page Codex polish pass (Phase 3) is the single most expensive but highest-value step, and is hidden behind the polished default so users get it without thinking about it.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.