requirements-analysis — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited requirements-analysis (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
本阶段在主对话中执行，需与用户多轮对话，不得臆造需求。
以下每组为一轮提问。每轮向用户呈现结构化选项，用户选择后再进入下一轮。
向用户确认以下内容（可合并为一组选项）：
Q1 — 是否有原型图或设计稿？
Q2 — 项目涉及哪些端？
Q3 — 用户角色？（可多选）
若用户没有原型图/设计稿，向用户呈现以下选项：
Q4 — 整体风格？
Q5 — 主色调？
Q6 — 布局方式？
Q7 — 响应式需求？
Q8 — 是否需要暗色模式？
Q9 — API 风格？
Q10 — 认证方式？
Q11 — 数据库偏好？
Q12 — 是否需要 API 文档自动生成（Swagger/OpenAPI）？
根据用户前面的回答，对仍有模糊的业务流程、异常分支、非功能需求进行针对性追问。此轮可使用开放式问题。
docs/{current_iteration_id}/requirements-{requirements_id}.md。history-manager skill 的 get-phase requirements 和 check-file 确认是否已完成。history-manager skill 的 set-phase requirements {requirements_id} 记录并推进状态。~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.