phase1-storyboarding— agent skill

phase1-storyboarding — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

Is phase1-storyboarding safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited phase1-storyboarding (Agent Skill) and scored it 87/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 3 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
87/100
●●●●●●●●●○
Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 24, 2026 · 134d ago
Scans run0 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings3 warnings · 0 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
64
22.4 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 3 flagged

Securityscore 64 · 3 findings
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · skills/phase1-storyboarding/CHANGELOG.md×2
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptskills/phase1-storyboarding/CHANGELOG.md· markdown
20## ✅ Live on claude.ai
21 
22- [2026-06-20] v8 — Dual-mode delivery in Close-out: detect environment and act (never ask "
… (108 chars elided on L22)
23- [2026-06-20] v8 — Attachments handling branched by environment: Code uses jsonl extraction
… (108 chars elided on L23)
24 
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L22, also L31
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L22
skills/phase1-storyboarding/CHANGELOG.md
L31
skills/phase1-storyboarding/CHANGELOG.md
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25614b7852251bf4666…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · skills/phase1-storyboarding/SKILL.md
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptskills/phase1-storyboarding/SKILL.md· markdown
252Use Toronto time for the date and HHMM: `TZ="America/Toronto" date "+%Y-%m-%d-%H%M"`.
253 
254**Delivery is environment-branched — detect and act, NEVER ask "claude.ai or Code?":**
255 
256- **In Code:** write the practice log (and its attachments folder if any) straight into `<no
… (108 chars elided on L256)
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L254
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha2564e0873a3c77e8cc3…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.