18 strategy frameworks for positioning that holds under pressure. By Petrichor Projects.
SaferSkills independently audited resilience-stack (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
18 strategy frameworks for positioning that holds under pressure.
Curated by Petrichor Projects. Built from our workshop catalog. Each skill = 50+ hours of framework engineering, packaged as a Claude Code skill you can run in 2.5 hours.
Not comprehensive. Curated. No filler.
npx resilience-stack add positioning-under-pressureOr clone the whole stack:
git clone https://github.com/petrichorprojects/resilience-stack ~/.claude/skills/resilience-stackSkills run inside Claude Code or the Claude Agent SDK. Bring your own API key — nothing phones home.
These skills ship with the full Resilience Stack toolkit: 3 eval cases, worked example, anonymized case study, scoring rubric, board-brief formatter, 5-min video walkthrough, quiz lead magnet, founder long-form essay, and launch copy bundle.
| Kit | Skill | Status | Quiz | Video | Essay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ⭐ relevancy-audit | Week 1 (2026-05-19) | marketing | shot list | essay |
| 2 | ⭐ revenue-story-audit | Week 2 (2026-05-26) | marketing | shot list | essay |
| 3 | ⭐ competitive-narrative-stress-test | Week 3 (2026-06-02) | marketing | shot list | essay |
| 4 | ⭐ pricing-authority-diagnostic | Week 4 (2026-06-09) | marketing | shot list | essay |
| 5 | ⭐ investor-story-forensics | Week 5 (2026-06-16) + HN | marketing | shot list | essay |
Read the manifesto · v1.5 roadmap · CHANGELOG
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| relevancy-audit | Relevancy Decay Model | Is your positioning still relevant — or solving yesterday's problem? |
| positioning-under-pressure | Pressure Test Protocol | When the market shifts, does positioning hold or crack? |
| competitive-narrative-stress-test | Narrative Attack Surface | Can your competitive story survive scrutiny? |
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| reality-audit | Reality Audit | What's actually true vs what the team believes? |
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| false-familiarity | Familiarity Trap Map | Does the market know you, or just recognize you? |
| brand-as-memory-system | Brand Memory Architecture | How does your brand actually live in minds? |
| legacy-brand-relevance-reset | Heritage-Innovation Bridge | When does heritage become a constraint? |
| brand-permission-boundaries | Permission Frontier Map | What is the market willing to let you become? |
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| revenue-story-audit | Revenue Narrative Gap | Does your revenue story match your mechanics? |
| pricing-authority-diagnostic | Price-Value Integrity Map | Do prices signal authority or fit a spreadsheet? |
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| category-creation-pressure-test | Category Viability Matrix | Are you creating a category or claiming one? |
| tam-lie-detector | TAM Lie Detector | Is your TAM real or rounded up? |
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| competitive-blind-spot-mapping | Blind Spot Taxonomy | What don't you see that competitors see? |
| signal-vs-noise-audit | Signal Integrity Framework | Which market signals deserve a response? |
| customer-truth-extraction | Customer Belief Audit | What do customers actually believe vs what you think? |
| Skill | Framework | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| investor-story-forensics | Narrative Due Diligence Protocol | Does your investor story survive forensic exam? |
| board-narrative-alignment | Board-Market Coherence Test | Is your board hearing the same story your market is? |
| exit-narrative-architecture | Acquirer's Lens Protocol | Does your story survive acquirer scrutiny? |
Inside Claude Code:
> /skill positioning-under-pressureOr invoke directly via the Skill tool with skill: "positioning-under-pressure".
Each skill is an interactive facilitator. It runs the workshop phase-by-phase, asks pressure-test questions, scores responses, writes deliverables to ./<skill-name>-output/.
Typical session: 2-3 hours. Output: 5 deliverables per workshop.
| Skill | Use when |
|---|---|
| skill-compass | You need to choose the right Resilience Stack skill before starting. |
| skill-creator | You are authoring or accepting a new strategy diagnostic skill. |
| interface-hardening | You need to harden a UI surface, form, workflow, dashboard, or API-bound interface against production edge cases. |
Each skill lists pre-work in its PHASE 1. Common requirements:
Skills will refuse to run on speculation. They demand evidence.
PRs welcome. Strict template. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
The bar: each skill must include framework, core question, 8-9 segments, 5 deliverables, adversarial facilitation rules. Generic frameworks rejected. PRs that don't match the template auto-close.
CC-BY 4.0. Free to use, modify, distribute — including commercially. Attribution required: credit Petrichor Projects with a link to https://petrichorgrowth.com.
Strategy advice on the internet is mostly platitudes. Real strategy work is adversarial — pressure tests, forensic audits, evidence demands. These 18 frameworks are what Petrichor runs for paying clients.
Open-sourced because reputation engineering is a network effect. The frameworks travel. The credit travels with them.
If you want the full workshop run by a Petrichor partner, scoring rubrics, slide deck, and post-workshop reports — see petrichorgrowth.com/stack.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.