work — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited work (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Orchestrate end-to-end task implementation: understand the task, assess complexity, implement directly or distribute across a team, then polish the result.
Read the task description from $ARGUMENTS.
$ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user for a task description and stop.Classify the task as simple or complex using these heuristics:
| Signal | Simple | Complex |
|---|---|---|
| File count | 1-3 files | 4+ files |
| Module span | Single module or package | Cross-module or cross-package |
| Dependency chain | No new dependencies | New packages or service integrations |
| Risk surface | Low (UI, docs, config) | High (auth, payments, data, infra) |
| Parallelism | Sequential steps only | Independent subtasks benefit from concurrency |
A task is complex when 3 or more signals fall in the complex column. When in doubt, prefer the simple path — team overhead is only justified when parallelism provides a real speedup.
Execute the task directly without spawning subagents.
Distribute work across a team of subagents.
#### 4a) Decompose
Break the task into independent subtasks. Each subtask should:
Avoid over-decomposition. If subtasks cannot run in parallel, prefer the simple path.
#### 4b) Create Team and Assign
Create a team with a name derived from the task (e.g., "add-auth", "refactor-api"). Create a task for each subtask. Set up dependencies when ordering matters.
Spawn implementation agents as teammates. Assign each agent one or more tasks.
Recommended team sizing:
#### 4c) Coordinate
Monitor progress. As agents complete tasks:
After all tasks complete:
Invoke the code-polish skill to simplify and review all session-modified files. If the harness cannot invoke skills directly (e.g., Codex), read ../code-polish/SKILL.md — sibling skill directory relative to this file — and follow its instructions inline.
Wait for completion. If it reports residual risks or stop conditions, relay them to the user.
This step is mandatory — always run it, even if the implementation seems clean.
| Error | Response |
|---|---|
Empty $ARGUMENTS | Ask for a task description and stop |
| Verification failures after impl | Attempt to fix; if unfixable, report to user before polishing |
| Team agent fails or times out | Reclaim the task and complete it directly |
code-polish reports stop condition | Relay to user with context |
Stop and ask for direction when:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.