grill-me — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited grill-me (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill is coordination-exempt: skip the ai-coord gate for its declared work.
Stress-test the plan in question rounds until every material branch is resolved and the user confirms shared understanding. User instructions take precedence over this skill.
decision branches into dependent decisions. Investigate facts discoverable from the codebase, environment, or supplied evidence instead of asking the user. Put decisions to the user and wait for their answers.
it after every answer. Reopen a recorded decision only when new evidence conflicts with it or the user corrects it.
investigate directly. Treat pending fact-finding as an unsettled prerequisite. Defer only dependent questions while asking the rest of the currently answerable questions.
frontier in each round. A question that depends on another open question belongs in a later round. Number each question as ### 🔥 Decision <N> — <topic>, then give Recommended, Why, Tradeoff, and Question. Separate question cards with a horizontal rule. Word each Question so "yes" accepts its Recommended choice. Wait for the user's answers before the next round.
✅ Recorded: <choice> — <consequence>. Recompute the frontier after each round. Whenuseful, show settled and currently open counts. Never show a percentage because the decision tree can grow.
rollout, ownership, and stopping criteria only where they are material to this design.
### ✅ Decision record with adecision/choice/rationale/consequence table. Then give ### ⚠️ Risks, accepted unknowns with owner/resolution point, rejected alternatives that matter, and ### 🏁 Completion criteria. Ask the user to explicitly confirm that the report reflects shared understanding. Wait for that confirmation before acting on the plan. If the user corrects the report, reopen the affected branches and continue the interview.
Completion requires every material branch to have a recorded decision or an explicitly accepted unknown with an owner and resolution point, followed by the user's explicit confirmation of shared understanding. The final report alone does not complete the workflow. After confirmation, act only within the user's authorized scope.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.