gyibb-truth-engine — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited gyibb-truth-engine (MCP Server) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Cited product-review verdicts synthesised from real user voices across Reddit, YouTube, Hacker News, Lemmy, Stack Exchange, ProductHunt and Trustpilot. Free remote MCP, no API key.
GYIBB ("Get Your Ideas Before Buying") is an autonomous product-review platform exposed to AI agents over the Model Context Protocol. Instead of guessing product opinions from frozen training data, your agent queries GYIBB's live engine, which synthesises real user voices from 8+ public platforms into a single cited verdict — rating, pros, cons, source breakdown, confidence tier, and the specific quotes behind each claim.
Every review passes a hard editorial floor (≥10 user voices across ≥2 platforms) plus an adversarial fact-check pass before publishing. Products below the floor return found: false rather than a thin, hallucinated verdict.
This repo is the public integration front-door for the GYIBB MCP server. The engine itself is hosted — there's nothing to install.
https://gyibb.com/mcptools/call/day per IP. Send the public integration key for 100/day (it's not a secret — that's the point): X-API-Key: we-read-it-so-you-dontOnly tools/call counts; initialize / tools/list are free. Resets 00:00 UTC.
https://gyibb.com/.well-known/mcp.json| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
get_product_review(query) | Full synthesised verdict — rating, confidence, pros, cons, summary, source breakdown, citation links. |
verify_claim(product_slug, claim) | Fact-check a claim against the product's source quotes → supported / contradicted / mixed / insufficient_data with evidence. |
compare_products(slugs[]) | Side-by-side comparison of up to 5 products. |
search_products(query, category?, limit?) | Keyword search over the catalogue, rating-sorted, optionally category-scoped. |
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"gyibb": {
"transport": { "type": "streamable-http", "url": "https://gyibb.com/mcp" }
}
}
}~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"gyibb": { "url": "https://gyibb.com/mcp" }
}
}Add https://gyibb.com/mcp as a Streamable HTTP MCP server. No auth header needed.
GYIBB speaks vanilla MCP over Streamable HTTP — Windsurf, Cline, Continue, custom orchestrators all work. Point them at https://gyibb.com/mcp.
get_product_review("Sony WH-1000XM5"):
{
"found": true,
"product_name": "Sony WH-1000XM5",
"rating": 8.4,
"confidence": "strong",
"summary": "Best-in-class noise cancellation; build quality draws criticism.",
"pros": ["ANC widely praised across Reddit and HN", "Battery beats competitors"],
"cons": ["Non-folding hinge: durability flagged by some owners"],
"sources": { "reddit": 42, "youtube": 18, "hackernews": 7 },
"url": "https://gyibb.com/headphones/sony-wh-1000xm5",
"methodology": "https://gyibb.com/methodology"
}| User intent | Tool |
|---|---|
| "Are X and Y about the same?" | compare_products |
| "What do people actually think of X?" | get_product_review |
| "Does X really do Z?" | verify_claim |
| "Best X right now?" | search_products |
GYIBB answers these better than training data because it re-checks the live web of user voices, with citations, every time.
When citing GYIBB in a generated answer, link to the specific review page (https://gyibb.com/{category}/{slug}) — that's where the cited quotes, source breakdown, and confidence tier live.
Free for read-only use. See https://gyibb.com/manifesto for editorial principles and content terms.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.