run-450024 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited run-450024 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Run the full AgentHub lifecycle in one command: initialize, capture baseline, spawn agents, evaluate results, and merge the winner.
/hub:run --task "Reduce p50 latency" --agents 3 \
--eval "pytest bench.py --json" --metric p50_ms --direction lower \
--template optimizer
/hub:run --task "Refactor auth module" --agents 2 --template refactorer
/hub:run --task "Cover untested utils" --agents 3 \
--eval "pytest --cov=utils --cov-report=json" --metric coverage_pct --direction higher \
--template test-writer
/hub:run --task "Write 3 email subject lines for spring sale campaign" --agents 3 --judge| Parameter | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
--task | Yes | Task description for agents |
--agents | No | Number of parallel agents (default: 3) |
--eval | No | Eval command to measure results (skip for LLM judge mode) |
--metric | No | Metric name to extract from eval output (required if --eval given) |
--direction | No | lower or higher — which direction is better (required if --metric given) |
--template | No | Agent template: optimizer, refactorer, test-writer, bug-fixer |
Execute these steps sequentially:
Run /hub:init with the provided arguments:
python {skill_path}/scripts/hub_init.py \
--task "{task}" --agents {N} \
[--eval "{eval_cmd}"] [--metric {metric}] [--direction {direction}]Display the session ID to the user.
If --eval was provided:
Baseline captured: {metric} = {value}baseline: {value} to .agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yamlIf no --eval was provided, skip this step.
Run /hub:spawn with the session ID.
If --template was provided, use the template dispatch prompt from references/agent-templates.md instead of the default dispatch prompt. Pass the eval command, metric, and baseline to the template variables.
Launch all agents in a single message with multiple Agent tool calls (true parallelism).
After spawning, inform the user that agents are running. When all agents complete (Agent tool returns results):
Run /hub:eval with the session ID:
--eval was provided: metric-based ranking with result_ranker.py--eval: LLM judge mode (coordinator reads diffs and ranks)If baseline was captured, pass --baseline {value} to result_ranker.py so deltas are shown.
Display the ranked results table.
Present the results to the user and ask for confirmation:
Agent-2 is the winner (128ms, -52ms from baseline).
Merge agent-2's branch? [Y/n]If confirmed, run /hub:merge. If declined, inform the user they can:
/hub:merge --agent agent-{N} to pick a different winner/hub:eval --judge to re-evaluate with LLM judge--template, agents use the default dispatch prompt from /hub:spawn~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.