sae-lookup — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited sae-lookup (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Turn a raw activation into a short list of named SAE features. This is the entry point to the full-stack SAE on Qwen3.6-27B (caiovicentino1/qwen36-27b-sae-fullstack, 11 layers, d_sae=40960, k=128) — the rare asset that lets you say which concepts are active, not just how active a direction is.
Call the MCP tool `sae_lookup` with:
sae_id: an SAE matching the active model and the layer (e.g. a layer-59 SAE for an L59 capture)capture_id: a stored capture (from capture_acts)layer: the layer whose activation to decompose — must be one the capture stored and the SAE was trained fortop_k (default 32): how many features to returnReturns top_features: feature_id, activation, and an auto-interp description when available, plus the manifest SHA256.
List the top features with their names and activations, highest first:
Layer {layer}: #{fid} "{description}" ({act:.2f}) · #{fid} "{description}" ({act:.2f}) · …
When the researcher is naming a feature for a probe, surface the max-activating description of the relevant feature and hand it to causality_protocol as feature_name — that is Check 4b.
d_model_mismatch.Match the SAE to the active model and the capture's layer.
sufficient — run causality-protocol for the causal verdict.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.