regulatory-analysis — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited regulatory-analysis (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
When analyzing a document or process for regulatory compliance:
When multiple frameworks apply, prioritize in this order:
## Regulatory Analysis Report
### Subject: [Description]
### Date: [ISO 8601]
### Analyst: compliance-analyst v1.0.0
### Confidence: [Overall confidence level]
### Applicable Frameworks
- [List of applicable regulatory frameworks with specific rules]
### Findings
#### CRITICAL
- **[Finding Title]** — [Framework] Rule/Section [Number]
- Issue: [Description]
- Evidence: [What was observed]
- Remediation: [Specific steps]
- Confidence: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
#### HIGH
[Same format]
#### MEDIUM
[Same format]
#### LOW
[Same format]
### Summary
[1-2 paragraph summary of overall compliance posture]
### Disclaimer
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.#### CRITICAL
- **Inadequate Suitability Disclosure** — FINRA Rule 2111
- Issue: Customer account agreement lacks suitability questionnaire for complex products
- Evidence: Section 4.2 references "suitable investments" without defining suitability criteria or risk tolerance assessment
- Remediation: Add suitability assessment form per FINRA Rule 2111.05 (Supplementary Material) before account opening
- Confidence: HIGH~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.