code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
When reviewing code:
## Review Summary
[1-2 sentence overview]
## Findings
### CRITICAL
- [Finding with line reference and fix]
### WARNING
- [Finding with line reference and fix]
### SUGGESTION
- [Finding with line reference and fix]
## What's Done Well
- [Positive observations]### CRITICAL
- **Line 42**: SQL injection vulnerability — user input concatenated directly into query string.
Fix: Use parameterized queries instead of string concatenation.cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.