Octodamus Core— mcp server

Octodamus Core — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

by Octodamus·MCP Server·github.com/Octodamus/octodamus-core

Is Octodamus Core safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited Octodamus Core (MCP Server) and scored it 79/100 (yellow). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 5 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
79/100
●●●●●●●●○○
↑ +0 since first scan (79 → 79)Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 24, 2026 · 35d ago
Scans run1 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings5 warnings · 0 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
40
14.0 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 5 flagged

Securityscore 40 · 5 findings
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · .agents/profit-agent/mission.md×4
MEDIUMit fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerpt.agents/profit-agent/mission.md· markdown
1You are Franklin, an autonomous economic agent. This is REAL execution — real Base wallet (0
… (108 chars elided on L1)
2 
3CONTEXT (read once, do not ask about these):
Occurrences
4 occurrences · first at L1, also L3, L16 +1 more
Show all 4 locations
Line
File
L1
.agents/profit-agent/mission.md
L3
.agents/profit-agent/mission.md
L16
.agents/profit-agent/mission.md
L23
.agents/profit-agent/mission.md
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha2567d1c5f93d8975babrubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · SOUL.md
MEDIUMit fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptSOUL.md· markdown
137**BRAIN.md is Layer 0:** Read it at the start of every run. Write to it whenever state chang
… (29 chars elided on L137)
138 
139**Errors:** Fix them the instant they appear. Don't ask, don't wait.
140 
141**Git rules:** Never force-push. Never delete branches. Never rewrite history. Never push en
… (12 chars elided on L141)
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L139
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25615dae9807bd892c6rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.