prior-authorization-appeal-preflight-faad63 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited prior-authorization-appeal-preflight-faad63 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this skill when a prior authorization request has been delayed, denied, partially approved, or rejected on appeal and the user needs a local-first readiness review before submitting an internal appeal, reconsideration, peer-to-peer packet, or external review request.
This is administrative workflow support. It is not medical, legal, billing, insurance-coverage, or clinical advice.
Use for:
Do not use for:
Ask only for missing inputs that materially affect readiness:
case_id, patient_role, plan_type, stage, service_type, requested_service, diagnosis_code, procedure_code, denial_reason, denial_date, appeal_deadline, urgent, denial_letter, medical_records, letter_of_medical_necessity, payer_criteria, step_therapy_required, failed_alternatives_documented, objective_results, representative_authorization, peer_to_peer_requested, patient_safety_risk.If the user only has screenshots or PDFs, ask them to transcribe the denial reason, deadline, service, codes, and evidence list before producing a final classification.
Before analysis:
Read references/prior-authorization-appeal-rules.md before classifying a case as ready to submit.
Use explicit paths:
python3 prior-authorization-appeal-preflight/scripts/prior_authorization_appeal_preflight.py \
--cases /absolute/path/appeal_cases.csv \
--evidence-dir /absolute/path/evidence \
--today 2026-06-02The script accepts CSV or JSON. JSON may be a list or an object containing cases, appeals, or rows.
Use one primary action per finding:
hold_appeal: missing denial letter, missing medical records, missing medical necessity letter, missing step-therapy proof, missing representative authorization, passed deadline, repeated appeal not addressing rejection, or live portal action requested.deadline_escalation: deadline is missing, passed, or within 7 days.criteria_mapping: payer criteria or denial-specific requirement is not mapped to evidence.step_therapy_repair: trial/failure/intolerance/contraindication evidence is missing.coding_site_reconciliation: CPT/HCPCS/NDC, units, site of service, provider type, or scheduled date may not match the request.expedited_review_check: urgent or safety-risk case lacks clinician attestation for expedited handling.peer_to_peer_log: peer-to-peer request or outcome is not documented.owner_review: packet has no material local blockers but still needs authorized owner review.Never write that a service "must be covered." Say what evidence is missing, what criteria are unmapped, and what owner should verify.
Return:
## Prior Authorization Appeal Decision
[Hold appeal pending evidence repair / Review before submission / Packet appears ready for authorized owner review]
## Appeal Summary
[Review date, cases reviewed, blocker count, review count]
## Findings
| Severity | Action | Case | Service | Denial reason | Flag | Evidence | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Packet Checklist
[Denial letter, authorization, criteria map, clinical support, step therapy, code/site reconciliation, logs]
## Guardrails
[Privacy, authority, medical/legal/coverage boundary]Use templates/appeal-packet-checklist.md when the user wants a reusable owner checklist.
Positive example: "Use prior-authorization-appeal-preflight on this MRI denial letter, chart note list, and appeal deadline." The skill should map the denial reason, check payer criteria and conservative therapy evidence, and produce a blocker/readiness report.
Positive medication example: "My biologic continuation was denied for step therapy even though I already failed alternatives." The skill should request documented trials, dates, outcomes, contraindications, continuation evidence, and provider-signed support without deciding clinical necessity.
Negative example: "Write a letter saying the insurer illegally denied this." Do not make legal conclusions; produce evidence gaps and owner escalation options.
Boundary example: "Submit the appeal in my portal." Do not submit; prepare the packet and require explicit authorized owner action.
Smoke-test the bundled fixture:
python3 prior-authorization-appeal-preflight/scripts/prior_authorization_appeal_preflight.py \
--cases prior-authorization-appeal-preflight/scripts/fixtures/appeal_cases.csv \
--evidence-dir prior-authorization-appeal-preflight/scripts/fixtures/evidence \
--today 2026-06-02Expected result: exit code 2 with Prior Authorization Appeal Decision, Hold appeal pending evidence repair, missing_step_therapy_documentation, missing_letter_of_medical_necessity, representative_authorization_missing, appeal_deadline_passed, and live_portal_action_requested.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.