parcel-claim-preflight-892531 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited parcel-claim-preflight-892531 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this skill to turn messy shipping records, customer messages, carrier scans, order receipts, photos, and packaging notes into a claim-readiness report. The goal is a practical evidence gate before submission, not legal advice or a guarantee that a carrier, insurer, or marketplace will pay.
Use for:
Do not use for:
.env files.Ask only for missing inputs that materially affect the claim decision:
Normalize the claim type as damage, loss, missing_contents, late, or unknown. Identify the carrier/platform, deadline, claim owner, and whether the packet is time-sensitive.
Read references/parcel-claim-rules.md when the case involves claim-type evidence mapping, packaging retention, deadline triage, declared-value exposure, or redaction decisions.
For a CSV-backed batch, run:
python3 parcel-claim-preflight/scripts/parcel_claim_preflight.py \
--shipments /absolute/path/shipments.csv \
--evidence-dir /absolute/path/evidence \
--today 2026-05-31Use the script output as the evidence inventory. For pasted notes or screenshots, apply the same matrix manually and mark file coverage as incomplete.
Prioritize blockers:
Do not convert weak evidence into certainty. If a packet is weak but the deadline is close, produce an urgent submission plan that separates facts, missing proof, and owner acceptance.
Use templates/claim-readiness-report.md for final reports. Include:
## Parcel Claim Decision
[Submit-ready after owner review / Review before submit / Hold claim pending evidence repair]
## Claim Summary
| Shipment | Carrier | Type | Value | Deadline | Decision |
|---|---|---|---:|---|---|
## Evidence Matrix
| Shipment | Required evidence | Status | Source | Repair action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## Blockers
| Shipment | Blocker | Why it matters | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|
## Submission Notes
[Concise carrier/platform-facing facts, no speculation]
## Do Not Upload
[Secrets, unrelated customer records, unsupported claims, or sensitive files found]Positive damage example: "Use $parcel-claim-preflight on these Shopify shipments and photo folders before I submit UPS damage claims." The skill should check proof of value, tracking, damage photos, outer and inner packaging photos, original packaging, deadlines, declared value, and redaction.
Positive loss example: "A FedEx shipment stopped scanning and the customer says it never arrived." The skill should focus on tracking history, proof of value, recipient statement, trace/search status, deadline, declared/insured value, and replacement status.
Negative example: "Write an angry letter saying the carrier stole the item." Do not make accusations; produce a fact-grounded claim packet or explain why evidence is missing.
Boundary example: "The customer threw out the box." Mark packaging/inspection risk clearly. Do not claim the damage packet is submit-ready unless the owner accepts that risk.
Smoke-test the bundled fixture:
python3 parcel-claim-preflight/scripts/parcel_claim_preflight.py \
--shipments parcel-claim-preflight/scripts/fixtures/shipments.csv \
--evidence-dir parcel-claim-preflight/scripts/fixtures/evidence \
--today 2026-05-31Expected result: a Markdown report with Parcel Claim Decision, at least one Hold claim pending evidence repair, and flags such as damage_photos_missing, packaging_photos_missing, original_packaging_unavailable, and claim_deadline_passed.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.