jwt-inspector — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited jwt-inspector (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Decode and audit JSON Web Tokens with no third-party dependencies. It splits the token, decodes header + payload, evaluates them against a set of security checks, and (for HMAC tokens) tries a fast offline crack of the signing secret against a wordlist.
confusion and brute-force risk.
nbf, missing iss/aud/sub.# Decode + audit
python skills/jwt-inspector/inspector.py "<token>"
# Read token from stdin
echo "<token>" | python skills/jwt-inspector/inspector.py -
# Try cracking the HMAC secret with a custom wordlist
python skills/jwt-inspector/inspector.py "<token>" --secret-list rockyou.txt
# JSON output
python skills/jwt-inspector/inspector.py "<token>" --jsonExit codes: 0 no high-severity issues · 1 high/critical issue found · 2 malformed input.
move to an asymmetric algorithm (RS256/ES256) where feasible.
user that signature verification with the correct key is what matters.
Cracking only runs for HMAC algorithms and only against the provided wordlist — it is a weak-key detector, not a brute-forcer. Only inspect tokens you are authorized to handle.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.