start-1f0c3b — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited start-1f0c3b (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Initialize the task and memory systems, then open the unified dashboard.
Check the working directory for:
TASKS.md — task listCLAUDE.md — working memorymemory/ — deep memory directorydashboard.html — the visual UIIf `TASKS.md` doesn't exist: Create it with the standard template (see task-management skill). Place it in the current working directory.
If `dashboard.html` doesn't exist: Copy it from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/dashboard.html to the current working directory.
If `CLAUDE.md` and `memory/` don't exist: This is a fresh setup — after opening the dashboard, begin the memory bootstrap workflow (see below). Place these in the current working directory.
Do NOT use open or xdg-open — in Cowork, the agent runs in a VM and shell open commands won't reach the user's browser. Instead, tell the user: "Dashboard is ready at dashboard.html. Open it from your file browser to get started."
If everything was already initialized:
Dashboard open. Your tasks and memory are both loaded.
- /productivity:update to sync tasks and check memory
- /productivity:update --comprehensive for a deep scan of all activityIf memory hasn't been bootstrapped yet, continue to step 5.
Only do this if CLAUDE.md and memory/ don't exist yet.
The best source of workplace language is the user's actual task list. Real tasks = real shorthand.
Ask the user:
Where do you keep your todos or task list? This could be:
- A local file (e.g., TASKS.md, todo.txt)
- An app (e.g. Asana, Linear, Jira, Notion, Todoist)
- A notes file
I'll use your tasks to learn your workplace shorthand.Once you have access to the task list:
For each task item, analyze it for potential shorthand:
For each item, decode it interactively:
Task: "Send PSR to Todd re: Phoenix blockers"
I see some terms I want to make sure I understand:
1. **PSR** - What does this stand for?
2. **Todd** - Who is Todd? (full name, role)
3. **Phoenix** - Is this a project codename? What's it about?Continue through each task, asking only about terms you haven't already decoded.
After task list decoding, offer:
Do you want me to do a comprehensive scan of your messages, emails, and documents?
This takes longer but builds much richer context about the people, projects, and terms in your work.
Or we can stick with what we have and add context later.If they choose comprehensive scan:
Gather data from available MCP sources:
Build a braindump of people, projects, and terms found. Present findings grouped by confidence:
From everything gathered, create:
CLAUDE.md (working memory, ~50-80 lines):
# Memory
## Me
[Name], [Role] on [Team].
## People
| Who | Role |
|-----|------|
| **[Nickname]** | [Full Name], [role] |
## Terms
| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| [acronym] | [expansion] |
## Projects
| Name | What |
|------|------|
| **[Codename]** | [description] |
## Preferences
- [preferences discovered]memory/ directory:
memory/glossary.md — full decoder ring (acronyms, terms, nicknames, codenames)memory/people/{name}.md — individual profilesmemory/projects/{name}.md — project detailsmemory/context/company.md — teams, tools, processesProductivity system ready:
- Tasks: TASKS.md (X items)
- Memory: X people, X terms, X projects
- Dashboard: open in browser
Use /productivity:update to keep things current (add --comprehensive for a deep scan).~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.