systematic-debugging — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited systematic-debugging (Agent Skill) and scored it 92/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 2 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 2 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Resist the urge to guess-and-patch. A bug you can't reproduce isn't fixed.
Capture the exact error/output. If you can't reproduce it, gather more signal before changing anything.
on the path; read the surrounding code and its callers. Form ONE hypothesis at a time about the root cause.
would be true only if your hypothesis holds. Confirm before fixing.
with a catch-all or a retry. Keep the change minimal.
(see test-driven-development). Re-run the full suite; confirm nothing else broke.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.