performance-profiling — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited performance-profiling (Agent Skill) and scored it 92/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 2 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 2 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The cardinal rule: measure before you optimize, and measure again after. Intuition about what's slow is usually wrong.
what input? Without a target you can't know when to stop.
Record the number — it's what you'll compare against.
not eyeballing. Find where the time/allocations actually go. The bottleneck is often not where you'd guess (it's frequently I/O, N+1 queries, or an accidental O(n²), not "slow code").
batching) beats micro-optimization. Change one thing.
only if it did; revert if it didn't.
silently regress later.
Red flags: optimizing without a measurement, micro-tuning a cold path, trading readability for speed that doesn't move the target number.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.