code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 92/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 2 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 2 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Review the DIFF, but read enough surrounding code to judge it in context.
git diff (or the relevant range). Read each hunk with itssurrounding function and callers — a change is only correct in context.
unvalidated input crossing a trust boundary.
null, trace it or write a quick check rather than guessing.
a concrete suggested fix. Call out what's GOOD too. Don't invent issues to seem thorough.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.