review-pr-e81450 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited review-pr-e81450 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request or branch diff using the knowledge graph.
Token optimization: Before starting, call help(topic="graph") for the full actions reference. Never include full files unless explicitly asked.
git diff main...<branch> to get changed filesgraph(action="build", base="main") to ensure the graph reflects the current state.review(base="main"):main (or the specified base branch) as the diff basequery(action="impact", base="main"):query(action="query", pattern="callers_of", target=<func>) for high-risk functionsquery(action="query", pattern="tests_for", target=<func>) to verify test coverage ## PR Review: <title>
### Summary
<1-3 sentence overview>
### Risk Assessment
- **Overall risk**: Low / Medium / High
- **Blast radius**: X files, Y functions impacted
- **Test coverage**: N changed functions covered / M total
### File-by-File Review
#### <file_path>
- Changes: <description>
- Impact: <who depends on this>
- Issues: <bugs, style, concerns>
### Missing Tests
- <function_name> in <file> - no test coverage found
### Recommendations
1. <actionable suggestion>
2. <actionable suggestion>query(action="search", search_query=<term>) to find related code the PR might have missed~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.