inbox-catchup — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited inbox-catchup (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Scan connected communication sources, build a prioritized briefing, and help triage and respond.
Edit these defaults before uploading, or override at runtime when prompted.
sources: all # "all" or comma-separated: gmail, calendar, slack
time_window: 4h # How far back to scan: 1h, 4h, today, yesterday
priority_contacts: [] # Names/emails that always surface first
reply_tone: professional # professional, casual, brief
auto_draft: true # Offer to draft replies for items that need responseCheck what communication integrations and tools are accessible in this session:
Report what was found:
Connected sources:
✅ Gmail — via Google Workspace
✅ Google Calendar — via Google Workspace
✅ Slack — via MCP server
❌ Messages — not connectedIf no communication sources are detected, explain what integrations are needed and how to connect them (Settings > Connected apps for Google Workspace, or configure MCP servers in Desktop settings). Then stop.
If this is the first time running in this conversation, ask:
Quick setup for this catchup: 1. Which sources to scan? (default: all connected) 2. Time window? (default: last 4 hours) 3. Any priority contacts to surface first?
Accept brief answers. If the user says "just go" or similar, use the defaults from the Configuration section above.
For each connected source, gather recent items within the time window:
Gmail:
Google Calendar:
Slack (if connected via MCP):
Other MCP sources:
Organize everything into three priority tiers:
🔴 Needs Reply — Messages directly to the user that appear to expect a response. Sort by sender importance (priority contacts first), then recency.
For each item show:
[Source] From: sender — subject/preview
Received: time ago
Context: 1-line summary of what they're asking/saying🟡 FYI — Worth Reading — Informational messages, CC'd threads, channel activity. No response expected but may be relevant.
For each item show:
[Source] subject/channel — 1-line summary
Why it matters: brief reason this was flagged🟢 Upcoming — Calendar events in the next few hours.
For each item show:
[Calendar] event title — time
With: attendees
Prep: any linked docs or agenda itemsShow a clean summary:
📬 Inbox Catchup — [date/time]
Scanned: Gmail, Calendar, Slack (last 4 hours)
🔴 Needs Reply (3)
1. [Gmail] Sarah — "Quick question about the API migration"
30 min ago — Asking which endpoint to use for the new auth flow
2. [Slack DM] Alex — "Can you review my PR?"
1h ago — Wants review on #342 before EOD
3. [Gmail] Jordan — "Meeting reschedule"
2h ago — Proposing Thursday instead of Wednesday
🟡 FYI (5)
• [Slack #engineering] Deploy discussion — team debating rollback strategy
• [Gmail] Newsletter from TechCrunch — AI funding roundup
• ... (3 more)
🟢 Upcoming (2)
• 10:30 AM — Sprint planning (with: team)
• 1:00 PM — 1:1 with manager (agenda doc linked)Then ask:
Want me to help draft replies? I'll take them one at a time, starting with the most urgent.
For each "Needs Reply" item (in priority order):
Never send a reply without explicit user confirmation. Always show the draft first.
After triage (or if the user chose not to reply):
✅ Catchup complete
Replied: 2 messages
Skipped: 1 message
Still pending: 0
Next event: Sprint planning in 45 min~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.