what-do-i-think — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited what-do-i-think (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
L2 synthesis that surfaces what the user has already decided/concluded about a topic before they re-ask. Deduplicates by 80-char lowercase prefix. Orders by importance (breakthrough > significant > routine). Every decision/question/quote carries a citation.
Precedent mode is a narrower projection: returns the closest past matches for a situation, filtered to exclude "none identified" decisions.
precedent when user cites a specific situation ("I'm facing a decision like Z")topic: str
mode: "synthesize" | "precedent" = "synthesize"Synthesize mode:
## What you think about: {topic}
### Top 5 summaries
{icon} **{title}** [conv_id · date]
> {summary_300ch}
### Key decisions (dedup by 80ch prefix, top 10)
- {decision} [conv_id · date]
### Still open (top 8)
- {question} [conv_id · date]
### Authentic quotes (top 5)
> "{quote}" [conv_id · date]Precedent mode: top 10 closest matches, each row cites one summary with decision field.
No summaries → Lance + keyword search on L0. Appends: "Running without summaries. For richer synthesis: `brain-mcp summarize`"
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.