search-summaries — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited search-summaries (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
L1 retrieval skill whose substrate is the L2 summary table. Each result IS a citation back to the underlying conversation (via conversation_id) and to the summary row (for downstream L3 consumers). The "extract mode" parameter projects different structured fields from the summary payload — still no synthesis, just projection.
semantic-search finds candidate messages and you want the structured versionextract="questions" → open questions only. extract="decisions" → decisions only. extract="quotes" → quotables only. Default extract="summary".query: str
extract: "summary" | "questions" | "decisions" | "quotes" = "summary"
limit: int = 10
domain: str | None
importance: "breakthrough" | "significant" | "routine" | None
thinking_stage: "exploring" | "crystallizing" | "refining" | "executing" | None
source: str | None
mode: "hybrid" | "fts" | "vector" = "hybrid"Markdown with per-row citations. Every row carries [conv_id · date] and [summary_id]. Extract modes project different structured fields but never paraphrase.
what-do-i-think)[a-zA-Z0-9\s\-_.,] is enforced)~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.