student-feedback-b1e6a7 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited student-feedback-b1e6a7 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Feedback changes learning only when it's specific, prioritised, and actionable. This skill writes comments that tell a student what worked, the one or two things to fix next, and exactly how — in a tone that keeps them motivated.
Given the work (or a description of it) and the level, write the full feedback anyway. If the actual work isn't pasted, give a strong model of well-structured feedback and note it should be grounded in the specific submission. No empty "[comment]" placeholders.
Ask for (if not already provided):
2–3 concrete strengths tied to the work ("your thesis in paragraph 1 is arguable and clear"), not "good job."
The 1–3 highest-leverage changes, in order. For each: what to change, why it matters, and a concrete example or model of the better version. Don't list every error — prioritise.
One specific, doable action for the next draft or assignment ("in your next essay, start each paragraph with a claim, then evidence").
Genuine, growth-oriented ("you're close — tightening your evidence will lift this a whole level"), not empty praise.
If a rubric was given, map the feedback to its criteria.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.