sprint-brief-5b7d89 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited sprint-brief-5b7d89 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Produce a clear, scannable sprint brief that every team member — engineer, designer, PM — can read in under three minutes and understand exactly what we're doing and why.
Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked (assumed, confirm) and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).
Sprint Goal: [1-2 sentences — specific and measurable] Why This Sprint Matters: [Connect to quarterly OKR in 2-3 sentences]
What We're Building:
Critical Path: [The 2-3 tickets everything else depends on]
Risks to Flag:
Carry-over from Last Sprint: [List + impact on current goal]
Definition of Done: [Specific, agreed criteria for sprint success]
This skill ships with support files — use them when they are available:
Score any output of this skill before handing it over; 32+ is ship-quality.
| Dimension | 0 | 5 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goal scoreability | Goal is a task list or a vague direction ("make progress on X") — nobody could score it at sprint end | Goal states one outcome but the pass/fail line is fuzzy (no number, date, or observable test) | Goal is a single outcome statement with an explicit pass/fail test anyone on the team could apply on the last day |
| Critical path precision | No critical path, or "the important tickets" — reader can't tell which slippage is fatal | Critical path tickets are named but without sequencing or the date/trigger at which the goal fails | Named tickets in dependency order, with the deadline that kills the goal and a clear fatal-vs-survivable split from the rest of the board |
| Risk actionability | Risks are a worry list — no mitigations, no owners | Each risk has a mitigation or an owner, but responses are generic ("monitor closely") | Every risk has a concrete mitigation with a ready-by date and a single named owner, and states whether it threatens the goal or just a ticket |
| Capacity honesty | Carry-over listed without impact; board is silently overloaded | Carry-over impact on the goal is stated, but the brief doesn't act on it — overload is flagged as a risk and left there | Carry-over is costed against capacity and the brief shows the resolution: named scope cuts, a de-scoped goal, or an explicit team-agreed overload acceptance |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.