figma-design-review-8e62ac — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited figma-design-review-8e62ac (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Runs a structured PM design review — checking that a design meets product requirements, covers all user flows, and is ready for engineering. This is a requirements-and-outcomes review, not an aesthetic critique.
Feature, review stage, reviewed by, date. Overall status: Approved / Approved with changes / Needs revision
| Requirement | Covered? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| [Requirement from PRD] | Yes/No/Partial | [Specific observation] |
Missing coverage summary: [Requirements not addressed — must resolve before approval]
| Flow step | Designed? | Issues |
|---|---|---|
| [Step] | Yes/No/Partial | [Issue] |
| Error state | Yes/No | |
| Empty state | Yes/No | |
| Loading state | Yes/No |
[Concern] — Blocking / Should fix / Nice to fix
| Question | Owner | Needed by |
|---|---|---|
| [Question] | Designer/Eng/PM | [Date] |
Approved / Approved with changes (list) / Needs revision (focus area + next review date)
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.