figma-component-audit-2d92a9 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited figma-component-audit-2d92a9 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Produces a structured audit of a Figma component library — identifying inconsistencies, naming problems, coverage gaps, and prioritised recommendations.
| Dimension | Status | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Naming consistency | Red/Amber/Green | /10 |
| Component coverage | /10 | |
| Variant completeness | /10 | |
| Documentation | /10 | |
| Overall health | /10 |
Verdict: What is the state of this library and the single most important thing to fix?
For each problem: Issue: [Problem type]
Naming convention to enforce:
| Missing Component | Priority | Why Needed |
|---|---|---|
| [Component] | High/Medium/Low | [Use case] |
| Component | Default | Hover | Active | Disabled | Error | Missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Button] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Active, Error |
| # | Fix | Effort | Impact | Do First? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Fix] | Low/Med/High | High | Yes |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.