clause-explainer-003eba — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited clause-explainer-003eba (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Most people sign clauses they don't fully understand. This skill translates a single clause into plain English, says who it really protects, rates the risk, and suggests how to push back. Not legal advice — interpretation depends on the full contract and jurisdiction; confirm with a qualified lawyer.
Given the clause text (or a description), explain it fully anyway. If only a clause type is named, explain the typical version and note it should be checked against the actual wording. Never refuse for missing surrounding context; flag what the rest of the contract could change.
Ask for (if not already provided):
What this clause actually does, in 1–3 jargon-free sentences.
Which party this protects or burdens, and how. Be direct.
Whether this is market-standard, founder/tenant/employee-favourable, or unusually one-sided — with what "normal" looks like for this clause type.
🟢 Low / 🟡 Medium / 🔴 High — and the specific scenario where it would bite.
Concrete redline suggestions: the change to ask for, with example wording where useful (e.g. "cap liability at fees paid in the prior 12 months", "add a 30-day cure period before termination").
The 1–2 things a lawyer should confirm against the full contract.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.