evolution-engine — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited evolution-engine (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The Evolution Engine autonomously discovers trading strategies from raw price data. It uses LLM-powered pattern generation combined with vectorized backtesting to evolve, test, and graduate viable trading rules — without manual rule writing.
This is not parameter optimization on a known strategy. It's open-ended strategy discovery: the LLM proposes novel entry/exit logic, the engine validates it against real data, and natural selection eliminates the losers.
OHLCV Data → LLM Generation → Vectorized Backtest → Selection → Mutation → Repeat
↓
Out-of-Sample Validation
↓
Graduated Strategies| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
evolution_fetch_market_data | Fetch OHLCV data from Binance for a symbol/timeframe/period |
evolution_discover_patterns | LLM-powered pattern discovery — generates N candidate strategies |
evolution_run_backtest | Backtest a single candidate — returns Sharpe, win rate, drawdown |
evolution_evolve_strategy | Full evolution loop: generate → backtest → select → mutate × N generations |
evolution_get_log | History of evolution runs: graduated strategies, graveyard, metrics |
Every backtest produces:
| Metric | Minimum for Graduation |
|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | > 1.0 (OOS) |
| Win Rate | > 40% |
| Max Drawdown | < 25% |
| Number of Trades | > 30 (statistical significance) |
| Profit Factor | > 1.2 |
These thresholds are guidelines. Context matters — a Sharpe of 0.9 with 500 trades may be more reliable than 2.5 with 15 trades.
evolution_get_log to review what was tried, what failed, and why.| Mistake | Why It's Bad | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Too few data points | Strategies overfit to noise | Use 90+ days for 1h, 180+ for 4h |
| Skipping OOS validation | In-sample Sharpe of 3.0 means nothing | Always validate on held-out data |
| Too many generations | Overfitting through excessive selection pressure | 3-5 generations is usually sufficient |
| Deploying immediately | No buffer for regime changes | Paper trade 2-4 weeks first |
| Ignoring the graveyard | Re-discovering dead strategies wastes compute | Review evolution_get_log before new runs |
| Using correlated symbols | BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT strategies overlap heavily | Test on uncorrelated markets |
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY — Required for LLM-powered pattern discovery~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.