issue-labelling — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited issue-labelling (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use when new issues come in and need categorisation. Applies consistent labels for type, priority, and component to keep the issue tracker organised.
Invoke this skill when processing new issues, during triage sessions, or when the /triage command runs.
| Label | Criteria |
|---|---|
bug | Something that worked before is now broken, or documented behaviour does not match actual behaviour |
feature | Request for new functionality that does not currently exist |
docs | Documentation is missing, incorrect, or unclear |
question | User needs help, not reporting a problem (redirect to discussions if available) |
| Label | Criteria |
|---|---|
priority: critical | Data loss, security vulnerability, or complete feature breakage with no workaround |
priority: high | Significant functionality affected, workaround exists but is painful |
priority: medium | Noticeable issue, reasonable workaround exists |
priority: low | Minor inconvenience, cosmetic, or affects very few users |
| Label | When to apply |
|---|---|
needs-info | Cannot reproduce or understand without more detail from reporter |
confirmed | Bug has been reproduced by a maintainer |
good first issue | Well-scoped, clear solution path, minimal project knowledge required |
help wanted | Maintainer cannot prioritise — community contributions welcome |
duplicate | Already reported in another issue |
wontfix | Intentional behaviour, or does not align with project direction |
Define component labels based on the project's architecture. Examples:
component: parsercomponent: clicomponent: apicomponent: uiFor each issue:
good first issue to anything requiring architectural knowledge or touching more than 2 files.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.